NOTICE OF CAUCUS TO ENDORSE CANDIDATES FOR ELECTION TO THE DEMOCRATIC TOWN COMMITTEE OF WALLINGFORD, CON­NECTICUT

To: Enrolled Mem­bers of the Democra­tic Party of the Town of Wallingford, Con­necticut:

Pursuant to the Rules of the Democratic Party and the state election laws, you are hereby notified that District caucuses will be held on January 6, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. at

Dag Hammarskjold Middle School, 106 Pond Hill Road, (Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 & 9) and

James Moran Middle School, 141 Hope Hill Road, (Districts 5, 6 & 7)

to endorse candidates for election to the Democratic Town Committee and to transact such other busi­ness as may be proper to come before said caucus.

Any resident of this Vot­ing District whose name appears on the last com­pleted Democratic Enroll­ment list may have his or her name placed on the bal­lot at this caucus by filing with the Democratic Regis­trar of Voters not less than five days prior to the cau­cus a signed statement that he or she desires to have his or her name appear on the ballot. Any such resi­dent may also have his or her name placed in nomina­tion from the floor at the caucus itself.

Article III Section 3. Calcula­tion of Membership:
Each voting district shall have one (1) member for every seventy-five (75) reg­istered Democrats residing in the district as of the last printed list in the month of December prior to the Town Committee caucus for the election of a new Town Committee.

Number of Members for Each Voting District

District 1:  5 Members

District 2: 14 Members

District 3: 12 Members

District 4: 14 Members

District 5: 14 Members

District 6: 12 Members

District 7: 13 Members

District 8: 8 Members

District 9: 8 Members

NOTE: It is recommended that those interested in running for a seat on the Democratic Town Committee contact their District Leader prior to the caucus to express their intent.

Agenda For Nominating Caucus

1. Call Convention to Order by Temporary Chair

2. Temporary Char Appoints Temporary Secretary

3. Temporary Secretary Reads Call of Caucus Notice

4. Temporary Secretary Makes Credential Report

5. Election of a Permanent Chair

6. Election of a Permanent Secretary

7. Nominations

8. Updated Report on Credentials / Attendance

9. Election

10. Announcement of Winners

11. Other Business

12. Adjourn

Rules and Guidelines on Town Committee Caucus Procedures

The below rules and guidelines are in response to frequently asked questions regarding the Town Committee Caucus Elections. Additional questions or clarification may be obtained by calling Democratic Town Committee Chairman Vincent Avallone at (203) 605-2716.

1. Caucuses for Town Committee are required by state law and are open to all town registered Democrats in accordance with local Registrar of Voters’ records.

2. Caucuses must be advertised in a local newspaper at least five full days before the caucus. Five full days does not include the date of the actual caucus. The time, date, location, and purpose of the meeting must be stated within the advertisement.

3. Caucuses must be held between January 5^th and 12^th 2010. Results of the caucus must be certified by the Town Clerk by January 13, 2010 at 4:00pm

4. Any registered Democrat may observe, vote, speak, or participate in the caucus.

5. According to state party rules, nominations the night of the caucus shall be taken by slate and by individual nominations from the floor.

6. After all nominations have been closed (slate and individual), voting may proceed.

7. Since the caucus is a local election, paper ballots and/or secret ballots are permitted. It is recommended that ballots be kept on file for at least sixty days after the election.

8. It is permissible on a paper ballot to identify “Town Committee Endorsed Candidates” if local Town Committee By-Laws allow for such a process.

9. Voters may not vote for more Town Committee members than slots available. If a voter votes for more members than available, the ballot should not be counted.

10. Voters may vote for as many or as few Town Committee members as desired in accordance with the slots available. For example, a voter may vote for only one Town Committee member on their ballot even if twenty are running.

11. DTC members must be elected by a majority of those present and voting. For example, if there are more people nominated than there are slots available, and there are fifty people voting at the caucus, only those who receive twenty-six votes or more are elected on any given ballot. If the full slate of party-endorsed candidates is not chosen on the first ballot, then the names of those who did not receive at least twenty-six votes should be voted on a second ballot, and so on until a full slate is chosen.

12. If a slate wishes to file for a primary, petitions and information on the number of signatures required on the petition may be obtained from the Registrar of Voters.

13. To obtain primary petitions, the challenge slate must consist of at least 25% of the total number of DTC members permitted on a Town Committee. For example, X town has twenty Town Committee members on its Town Committee. A primary slate must have at least five candidates on its petition. These candidates need not be members of the caucus-endorsed Town Committee or of the existing Town Committee.

14. New DTC members take office on the day after the day scheduled for the primary. Town Committee Primaries are scheduled for March 2, 2010. Even in towns where no primary is being held, members do not take office until March 2, 2010. Town Committee Officers are elected after the March primary date.

Technorati Tags: Wallingford,Democrat,Town Committee

JIB-JAB - Never a Year Like '09

Try JibJab Sendables® eCards today!

MP3 AUDIO – Wallingford Town Council Meeting – December 15, 2009 is now online

The regular meeting of the Wallingford Town Council from December 15, 2009 is now online and available in MP3 audio format.

You can now download the MP3 files and listen to the council meeting in your car on the way to work or while going for a walk or whenever you have the free time to listen in.

There is no need to be a slave to the schedule of the actual meetings every 2nd and 4th Tuesday or the broadcast schedule on Government Access TV (if you get it), nor do you need to sit in front of the computer and stare at the screen for 3+ hours Click the links and let the file download and SAVE AS to put it on any MP3 device.

If you decide to open it directly and begin streaming (or if your audio player does this by default) it may need to wait for one to two minutes for the download to reach a point where it will begin to play on its own.

It’s your town – get informed and get involved.

Wallingford Town Council from December 15, 2009 – PART 1

Wallingford Town Council from December 15, 2009 – PART 2

Technorati Tags: MP3,AUDIO,Wallingford,Council,Meeting

POLL RESULTS - Should Wallingford fund the remainder of the work ($756,000) to build the walking loop that would connect the senior center to the Quinnipiac River Linear Trail

17 people responded to the poll over the week that it ran.

41% felt that Wallingford should fund the remainder of the work at a cost of $756,000 to build the walking loop that would connect the senior center to the Quinnipiac River Linear Trail.

23% felt that we should not.

23% felt that we should but after 2011 when the economy recovers.

11% felt that what we have already is nice enough and no further additions should be done to the trail.

Technorati Tags: Wallingford,Quinnipiac River Linear Trail

Final Date for SullivanOneOnOne Blog

Hello everyone.

I wanted to let all the followers of the SullivanOneOnOne Blog know that the lights will go out effective Friday December 18th.

It's been a great run the past three years the majority of which was delivered by John Sullivan personally and in the recent months since the June timeframe by myself.

John and I have had a couple of discussions on the possible direction of the blog since he won his seat on the council and it just wasn’t going to be possible for him to pick the effort back up and be able to balance work, family life, and his new role as Town Councilor for Wallingford.

That decision ends this effort here.

Wanting there to still be a place for an open discussion and vetting of issues centric to the operation and support of the political process in Wallingford I opted to create another blog – Wallingford Politico -which has been up and running for the past couple of months.

I hope you will join me there as you have here and we can keep the discussions productive and lively going into the next year and potentially decade regarding our town.

Technorati Tags: Blog,Town Council,Wallingford

Thoughts on “State funding for Wallingford zoning plan may be in jeopardy”

I have a cross post over on my other blog with respect to an article that ran in the Record Journal Wednesday December 9, 2009 regarding Wallingford Incentive Hous­ing Zone and how the state funding for it is now at risk.

The full story is cross posted at State funding for Wallingford zoning plan may be in jeopardy if you want to read all the details.

The summary of the information as reported is:

• The HOMEConnecticut Program is a state program run through the Office of Policy and Management
• It pays towns up to $4,000 for every housing unit in high-density housing zones
• Un­der the program, municipalities are eligible to receive $2,000 for every housing unit approved within the zones and another $2,000 for each unit that is actually built.
• Wallingford’s proposed Incentive Housing Zone is about 23.3 acres
• It includes some of the sections of Hall Avenue, Quinnipiac Street and the intersection of North Colony and Center streets
• It is an overlay of the town’s current zoning regulations for these areas
• The area as outlined would allow for a maxi­mum of 361 housing units.
• This high-density, mixed-use re­tail and housing is similar to West Hart­ford’s Blue Back Square
• If it is fully developed the town could be receiving $1.44 million in incen­tive payments
• Governor Rell wants to use the money from the program to cut the state’s budget deficit.

So with these highlights of information – should Wallingford move ahead with the plans despite, perhaps, not getting the money from the HOMEConnecticut Program if Governor Rell does in fact pull the funding to try to cut the state’s budget deficit?

My thoughts are we should still go forward with our plans. We should still try to pursue the funds if they are available but we should plan on moving ahead without them.

There is much to be gained in trying to bring forward some uniformity of the buildings downtown as part of encouraging some additional investment and development of our downtown.

The old Knights of Columbus land now has new housing on it and I think that is a nice little gem that could be added to if we continue to pursue the entire plan.

If I remember correctly, all of these townhouse units are sold and there is another small set being planned for a little further down the street.

Available housing to purchase downtown (not rent as we have with all the apartments there currently) may bring more demand to the existing businesses there and due to the increased demand of occupied homes it may allow for more businesses to establish themselves.

It will certainly bring more foot traffic from those residents that currently and will call those new places yet to be built, home.

Add all that with the potential of (someday) having a Metro North type commuter rail from New Haven to Springfield Mass and you just amplify the possibilities.

There are always other sides to the story – what are your thoughts?

Technorati Tags: HOMEConnecticut Program,Incentive Housing Zone,State funding,Wallingford,zoning

VIDEO – Wallingford Town Council Meeting - November 24, 2009

The regular meeting of the Wallingford Town Council November 24, 2009 meeting is now available.

Since the mayor has given the order to stop providing the council meetings online I have decided that, in light of fact that other towns coming online to do this and due to the fact that the election season is upon us, that I will provide the meetings as I am able to.

It’s your town – get informed and get involved.

Wallingford Town Council Meeting – November 24, 2009 – PART 1

Wallingford Town Council Meeting – November 24, 2009 – PART 2

Wallingford Town Council Meeting – November 24, 2009 – PART 3

Technorati Tags: meeting,Town Council,video,Wallingford

Additional Thoughts on the Wallingford Charter Revision

There was an article in the Record Journal this morning written by Dave Moran titled Dickinson had big financial role in PAC opposing charter change which is cross posted over on my other blog.

After reading this some thoughts come to mind regarding the recent election in addition to some others that I have shared before:

• I supported some of the proposals - I voted YES on those
• Others I didn’t and I voted NO
• There was plenty of information available regarding the proposed changes
• There was ample time and opportunity to get the facts
• Some of the people that turned out to vote made choices based based on their knowledge of the subject matter (whatever level that may be)
• Some voted the way they were told to vote
• Some were scared into voting a certain way
• The majority of registered voters - 64.4% - simply didn’t show up
• The majority of the 35.6% of the voters that showed up wanted no changes made.

So I make a lot of different things of these facts but the bottom line is – the people that wanted to have a say had their say and they said “let’s keep things the way they are.”

There is no arguing around that and there is no point – that is why the process is set up the way that it is. It is set up this way so that everyone has an equal say in their vote – all they need to do is exercise that right.

There has been some additional discussion around who donated what, where, and how much. There is a reason all of this information is recorded and why the paperwork is filed locally and with the state. It gets a review and some additional scrutiny when someone questions something but generally things that are in plain sight are on the up and up which is why I am such a proponent of making sure that what is public information gets put out more broadly and openly.

It would seem to me that Mayor Dickinson is well within his rights to contribute to a PAC.

At the same time, it seems that it is within legal boundaries for PACs to donate up to $2,000 a year to other PACs so when the Com­munity Initiative PAC made the donation to the Save Our Charter PAC it was above board.

Additionally when the Mayor’s campaign committees paid their surpluses into the Com­munity Initiative PAC, it is also allowed under Connecticut election laws.

So these are my thoughts – tell us, what are yours?

Technorati Tags: Wallingford,PAC,Election

FROM WALLINGFORD - Ordinances and outrage

As published online at MyRecordJournal.com for print publication in the Record Journal on Sunday December 6, 2009

The Wallingford Ordinance Committee is tasked at their meetings to review the ordinances in place and to discuss new ones. The next meeting is Tuesday, December 8, 6:30 PM at Town Hall, Room 315.

I understand the need for local ordinances - not everyone will govern themselves near what most would consider baseline behavior of a citizen on their own; you need to have rules that set and explain what those baseline expectations are.

Some people will not break rules while others do whatever they please because they assume they won't get caught (or they simply do not care).

The recent parking enforcement issue at the Carini Bowl is one example. I'm not happy people got ticketed that day, but I am gratified that the rules are getting enforced as it vindicates those of us that follow them when the rule-breakers get pinched.

Many people that got ticketed, even after being told to move, said, "Well, I saw the sign - was told to move, but I just didn't think I'd get a ticket."

And that is actually the crux of the issue; generally the ordinances are not enforced. When we start everyone is up in arms because they are caught off guard that we're "suddenly" doing something we should be enforcing unilaterally and consistently.

Take the sidewalk obstruction ordinance that requires residents to clear sidewalks around their homes or businesses within 18 hours after a snowstorm . . . I see many sidewalks that NEVER get cleared by anyone - so all this talk about how the ordinance works is interesting, but do we use it in practice? I am not asking: have we ever used it? I am asking: do we enforce it regularly as the infractions are reported? When was the last $25 ticket issued for not clearing the sidewalk? When was the last time a resident had their walked cleared by Public Works and then billed for it?

So what's the answer to all this? That is a tough question.

The ordinance committee will tell you they create and review the ordinances but they are not in charge of enforcement. Those that are responsible for enforcement (often different groups; it is not always the police department) will often tell you why they are not successful - no real enforcement power (no ability to fine or take action), not enough manpower, etc.

My thoughts are we should put all the ordinances up on the town website.

If someone breaks a specific ordinance in a 12-month rolling period from the time of the infraction, they should get a written warning, a printed copy of the specific ordinance and it should be cataloged. If the infraction occurs a second time, they should be fined.

Fines should be dramatically increased - a huge deterrent. If I park illegally 50 times and pay just $15 once, I can justify the cost. Not that I want to throw away $15, but it can cost more to park in a New Haven garage. Fines have to grow to the cost of the times, and then some - they need to be a burdensome expense to stop causal infraction of the law by people who don't care in the first place.

If responsible enforcement divisions are understaffed, then contract out the position to enforce the ordinances; with heavier fines, we can justify the cost against that revenue. If there isn't enough work, then allow the departments to take the work back on and end the contract position.

We should be enforcing ordinances unilaterally and consistently. If the argument is that we do not need to have that kind of iron fist mentality, then I suggest that ordinance doesn't need to exist and we should take it off the books.

Technorati Tags: FROM WALLINGFORD,Opinion,Wallingford,Ordinance

MP3 AUDIO – Wallingford Town Council Meeting – November 24, 2009 is now online

The regular meeting of the Wallingford Town Council from November 24, 2009 is now online and available in MP3 audio format.

You can now download the MP3 files and listen to the council meeting in your car on the way to work or while going for a walk or whenever you have the free time to listen in.

There is no need to be a slave to the schedule of the actual meetings every 2nd and 4th Tuesday or the broadcast schedule on Government Access TV (if you get it), nor do you need to sit in front of the computer and stare at the screen for 3+ hours Click the links and let the file download and SAVE AS to put it on any MP3 device.

If you decide to open it directly and begin streaming (or if your audio player does this by default) it may need to wait for one to two minutes for the download to reach a point where it will begin to play on its own.

It’s your town – get informed and get involved.

Wallingford Town Council from November 24, 2009 – PART 1

Wallingford Town Council from November 24, 2009 – PART 2

Wallingford Town Council from November 24, 2009 – PART 3

Technorati Tags: MP3,AUDIO,Wallingford,Council,Meeting

POLL CLOSED - How should the Wallingford Town Council move on the Police Station

Make a decision to move forward with the new construction on the Wooding-Caplan parcel but delay until after 2011

Make a decision to move forward with the construction of a satellite station or a precinct on the Wooding-Caplan parcel but delay until after 2011

Make a decision to move forward with the new construction on the Wooding-Caplan parcel in the next year to take advantage of cost savings

Make a decision to move forward with the construction of a satellite station or a precinct on the Wooding-Caplan parcel in the next year to take advantage of cost savings

Make a decision to revisit in three years to reassess the needs again

While this is no where near a scientific poll with just 11 respondents we can see that the majority of the people (10 of the 11 voters) chose “Make a decision to revisit in three years to reassess the needs again”

Only one person chose “Make a decision to move forward with the construction of a satellite station or a precinct on the Wooding-Caplan parcel but delay until after 2011”

Technorati Tags: Wallingford,Police Station,Wooding-Caplan,taxes

Ordinance Committee Special Meeting

Tuesday, December 8 @ 6:30 PM

---

Town Hall, Room 315
45 South Main Street 
Wallingford, CT 06492

Wallingford Town Council SPECIAL MEETING Ordinance Committee December 8, 2009 at 6:30 P.M. Room #315 -- Town Hall 45 South Main Street, Wallingford, CT 06492

AGENDA

1. Brief review of issues regarding the "dog ordinance" and report from the Law Department on construction of pertinent statutes.

2. Continued discussions of an ordinance that would give the Planning & Zoning Commission/Zoning Enforcement Officer the power to levy fines for certain violations of the Zoning Regulations under certain conditions, including a report from the Law Department regarding as to when an appeal might be taken, and to what authority, under various concepts under discussion.

_______________________ Mike Brodinsky, Chairman

Technorati Tags: Wallingford,Ordinance,Committee,Meeting