Search This Blog

Sunday, December 29, 2013

With all of the thank you letters formally mailed out, I wanted to also post my thanks online for the end of 2013

image

December 29, 2013

With the election over and the holiday season coming to a close, I wanted to take this time to thank you so kindly for your support of my campaign for Mayor of Wallingford which culminated last month.

While it is unfortunate that the goal of winning the election was not reached, it does not diminish the hard work and support that I received from you during the campaign. We accomplished things this past year that haven’t been done in the past 20 years – this cannot be underscored enough. It was a campaign for “the record books” and I am humbled and honored that you were a part of it with me.

I still fully believe that Wallingford’s best days are ahead of us; they will simply develop differently than the vision we all shared.
I have the honor to have served as a Wallingford Town Councilor for this past two year term and with my final meeting now past I leave those duties and tasks to those nine that were chosen by the electorate on Election Day. They will have the direct charge of fighting for a better Wallingford and they will be responsible to figure out the ways to make the changes that are needed to make our town an even better place to live, work, and play, to make it an even better place to raise a family, start and grow a business, and retire.

All of us that are concerned with this as well, as voters, residents, and taxpayers, MUST be present to keep them on OUR task of delivering that future.

While I may be out of office there are still many things to be done. I do not need a chair “up there” to bring these things to fruition; it would be easier but it can still be done. I will spend some time thinking outside the box on how to do just that. I hope that as those times come you can once again support those efforts, in whatever fashion they are, to help move Wallingford forward.

Once again, I am humbled by the help, support, and encouragement that I received; it was an experience that I will never forget.

With deepest gratitude,
Jason Zandri

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Follow up from public hearing regarding the Title V permit for Covanta

On December 11 there was a public hearing about the Title V permit for Covanta.

The meeting was recorded and is playing on WPAA but it is also on demand at WPAA. Please go to the link and go to video on demand which is located on top of the screen. The video is on page two.
http://www.wpaa.tv/#

The full video is a little over two hours so some of the important issues discussed were:

1.The entire plant is NOT tested every year but on a rotational basis so each stack is tested once every three years.

2. Positive burn and fires which happen are fires where the emissions leave the plant before they are scrubbed so unknown pollutants are affecting the area.

3. There have been no water tests of Dioxin in approximately twenty years. This means our public drinking water and waterways such as Wharton Brook State Park which people fish and swim in have not been tested for Dioxins.

There is a public comment period until December 30 2013.
I would hope that you would watch the video and share your concerns with EPA and DEEP. Lakiesha Christopher (Connecticut DEEP) is the contact below is her e-mail address.


Lakiesha.Christopher@ct.gov

Thursday, December 12, 2013

DEEP Best Management Practices for Disposal of Snow Accumulations from Roadways and Parking Lots

A letter has been sent to Henry McCully and Mayor Dickinson’s Office regarding snow removal over all in town and the use of the Garden Road property – you can follow this link to read it.

Below are the available DEEP Best Management Practices for Disposal of Snow Accumulations from Roadways and Parking Lots.

Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection

Best Management Practices for Disposal of Snow Accumulations from Roadways and Parking Lots

Purpose: These guidelines have been developed to clarify DEEP recommendations to state and municipal officials, and others regarding the removal and disposal of snow accumulations from roadways and parking lots. For purposes of this guidance snow accumulations refers to snow banks and snowpiles that are removed by front-end loader or by loading on trucks for disposal. This guidance does not apply to normal snow plowing operations that must, inevitably, discharge some snow into wetlands and watercourses.

Implementation: While following these guidelines does not constitute a permit or authorization, the Department recognizes there is a considerable need for flexibility in implementation of this policy, particularly in emergency situations. There is no intent to interfere with snow plowing operations. Where trucking and snow dumping operations are undertaken the Department recommends these guidelines be followed.

Problem: Current road maintenance activities include removal of snow accumulations from bridges, roads and parking areas for the purpose of providing more space for subsequent snow storms and for ease of travel and parking. Sometimes this snow is moved by truck or with a front-end loader and deposited directly into surface waters of the state including streams, wetlands and Long Island Sound. This practice is not recommended due to the presence of dirt, salt, litter and other debris, which are routinely mixed in the accumulated snow.

Under normal conditions of snowmelt, the majority of these contaminants remains on or next to the paved surface or may be captured in stormwater catch basins. These contaminants can then be swept from streets and bridges or vacuumed from catch basin sumps. However, when accumulated snow is collected and dumped into surface waters, this mixture of snow, sand and debris may smother aquatic life in the bottom of streams and rivers and degrade the aesthetics of the surface water with silt plumes and litter. Large quantities of snow (and the sand and debris) may also cause blockage of storm drainage systems, resulting in increased chance for localized flooding.

Recommended Management Practice: Snow accumulations removed from roadways, bridges, and parking lots should be placed in upland areas only, where sand and other debris will remain after snowmelt for later removal. Care must be exercised not to deposit snow in the following areas:

  • freshwater or tidal wetlands or in areas immediately adjacent to such areas where sand and debris may be flushed during rainstorms;
  • on top of storm drain catch basins;
  • in storm drainage swales;
  • on stream or river banks which slope toward the water, where sand and debris can get into the watercourse; and
  • in areas immediately adjacent (within at least 100 feet) of private or public drinking water well supplies (due to the possible presence of road salt).

For Governmental Entities: In normal winter conditions, governmental entities should follow the recommended management practices outlined above. In extraordinary winter conditions, the commissioner may, upon public notification, offer governmental entities the flexibility of limited in-water disposal. When such flexibility is offered, governmental entities who have determined that extraordinary circumstances exist where all upland, land-based disposal options have been fully exhausted (i.e., disposal capacity is not available) and snow needs to be removed to meet public safety demands (i.e., clear access ways for police, emergency medical and fire responders), may use certain waterways for snow disposal in accordance with the following conditions:

  • Upland storage and disposal of snow (i.e., athletic fields, parks and other flat, open-field sites) and other snow management methods (i.e., snow melting equipment) must be the first alternatives explored and exhausted. Environmentally sensitive areas must be avoided;
  • This guidance applies only to snow and ice which is not visibly contaminated with material other than salt and sand from road clearing activities;
  • For coastal communities, preference should be given to snow disposal in salt water where available;
  • Disposal in rivers or streams must be limited to those water bodies that have adequate flow and mixing and are not prone to ice jams;
  • The disposal must occur only in open water in areas that will not interfere with navigation;
  • Disposal must be conducted in a manner so as to prevent ice dam formation or damage to bridges, docks or other structures;
  • Disposal in ponds and lakes is discouraged;
  • There shall be no disposal in coastal or freshwater wetlands, eelgrass beds, vegetated shallows, vernal pools, shellfish beds mudflats, public water supply reservoirs and their tributaries, or others areas designated as being environmentally sensitive;
  • The activity must comply with local laws and requirements;
  • Precautions must be taken to avoid shoreline or stream bank damage or erosion from truck/equipment activity; and
  • Governmental entities must notify the Department by email (address email to kevin.sowa@ct.gov) prior to disposing of snow and ice in waterways or, if advance notification is not possible, then the Department must be contacted as soon as possible after snow disposal has begun.

Notification: Notification can be made by addressing an email to Kevin Sowa at: kevin.sowa@ct.gov. The notification must include the following: (1) the name of the governmental entity making the notification; (2) contact information for the governmental entity including name, email address and phone number; (3) the street address where the snow disposal activity will occur; (4) the name of the waterbody where the snow will be disposed; (5) the estimated quantity of snow to be disposed; (6) the dates during which the disposal activity will occur; and (7) a statement that the governmental entity has exhausted all disposal alternatives and snow management methods and will make best efforts to adhere to these snow disposal guidelines.

Information: For further information please call the Water Permitting and Enforcement Division Engineer of the Day at 860-424-3018.

DEP-PED-GUID-002 Revised 02/04/11

Friday, December 6, 2013

Notice of Public Hearing - Applicant: Covanta Projects of Wallingford, L.P.

Notice of Public Hearing

Applicant: Covanta Projects of Wallingford, L.P.
Application No. 201207877
City/Town: Wallingford, CT

The Commissioner of the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection ("DEEP") hereby gives notice of an informational hearing to take public comments concerning the draft Title V permit for Covanta Projects of Wallingford, L.P and shall be held on December 11, 2013 as more thoroughly described herein.

Application No.:

201207877

Applicant's Name and Address:

Covanta Projects of Wallingford, L.P.

530 South Cherry Street, Wallingford, CT

Contact Name/Phone/Email:

Mr. Matthew Venturi, 860-589-6470, MVenturi@CovantaEnergy.com,

Type of Permit/Activity:

Informational public hearing to take public comments concerning the draft Title V permit

Relevant statute(s)/Regulation:

RCSA sections 22a-174-22a(c) and 22a-174-33

Type of Facility:

Resource Recovery

NOTICE OF HEARING

DEEP will hold an informational public hearing on this application on December 11, 2013 at 6:30pm at the Wallingford Council Chambers, Town Hall, 45 South Main Street, Wallingford, CT. The hearing will consist of informational presentations by the parties and the collection of public comment on the record.

The informational hearing will be moderated and recorded by a DEEP hearing officer and will proceed in the following order: presentations from the panel, including the applicant, DEEP, and petitioners; a 15-minute break for informal questions and answers between members of the public and the panel which will not be recorded nor be part of the hearing record; and then the continuation of the informational hearing to receive oral and written comments from members of the public. Comments will be heard in the order in which members of the public sign up at the informational hearing.

Written comments will be accepted at the informational hearing and until the close of business on December 20, 2013, when the hearing record will close. All written comments submitted after December 11, 2013 shall be submitted to the Engineering & Enforcement Division of the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, 5th Floor, 79 Elm Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06106.

Once the hearing record is closed, DEEP staff will prepare a response to comments document and DEEP’s recommendation, along with a proposed Title V permit, will be sent to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 1 for consideration and the issuance of a determination.

Members of the public should refer to the DEEP Calendar of Events at www.ct.gov/deep/calendar for the official schedule in this matter, including cancellations, or other schedule alterations.

The Title V permit application and draft permit may be examined at the DEEP Public file room, at the address mentioned above. Interested persons who wish to obtain more information regarding the application and draft permit may do so by contacting Lakiesha Christopher of the Engineering and Enforcement Division by mail at the address above, by electronic mail to lakiesha.christopher@ct.gov, or by calling (860) 424-4152.

The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection is an Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Employer that is committed to complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act. To request an accommodation contact us at (860) 418-5910 or deep.accommodations@ct.gov.

Published in The Record-Journal on November 8, 2013

Draft Permit (PDF)
Draft Technical Support Document (PDF)

Monday, November 18, 2013

Wallingford Democratic Town Committee Meeting

Wallingford Democratic Town Committee Meeting

Wednesday, November 20,  2013

Time: 7:00PM  350 Center Street Wallingford, CT

Meeting Agenda

1)    Pledge of Allegiance
2)    Roll call
3)    Minutes
4)    Treasurers Report
5)    Chairman’s comments
       Discussion of election results
       The terms of three constables and a planning and zoning commissioner will expire
       on 1/7/14 and 1/8/14 respectively.
6)    Committee Reports
7)    Adjournment

Those interested in the above seats should contact Chairman Avallone via letter or e-mail and interviews will be held prior to the December 18th DTC meeting.

Those interviewed will have an opportunity to address the DTC at the Dec. 18th meeting and elections, if necessary, will be held at the Jan.15, 2014 DTC meeting.

The term of a constable is two years and the planning and zoning term is five years. William Nolan, Joe DaCunto and Tim Wall are the current constables while Jim Fitzsimmons is the P&Z commissioner.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

DEEP Notice of violation document issued November 7, 2013

Click on the image below to access the entire Notice of Violation

image

Secretary Merrill Releases Turnout Figures from 2013 Municipal Elections

clip_image001

Denise Merrill

Secretary of the State

Connecticut

For Immediate Release:

November 13, 2013  

- News Release -

Secretary Merrill Releases Turnout Figures from 2013 Municipal Elections

Statewide Voter Turnout Figure 31.43%; Bridgewater Reported Highest Turnout at 77.39%, Hartford Lowest at 5.21%

Hartford: Secretary of the State Denise Merrill today released voter turnout numbers from the 2013 Municipal Elections which showed that overall, the statewide voter turnout among registered voters in Connecticut was 31.43%.  The town with the highest voter turnout for the municipal offices was Bridgewater, where 77.39% of registered voters cast ballots.  The municipality with the lowest voter turnout was Hartford, where only 5.21% of registered voters cast ballots.  A complete listing of turnout among towns that held elections on November 5, 2013 follows at the end of this news release. 

“Municipal elections usually have lower turnout figures than state or Presidential elections, even though the impact of the decisions made by those elected to local government is huge in the community,” said Secretary Merrill, Connecticut’s chief elections official.  “Many races were decided by just a handful of votes, and we had a number of recounts as a result, which shows once again how important it is to do your civic duty and cast a ballot.  I also want to praise our local election officials for accommodating all of the new voters in Connecticut who used their new right to register and vote on Election Day.  From everything we are hearing Election Day registration went very smoothly in 2013, and we look forward to even more voters being welcomed into the democratic process next year.”

The following reflects numbers reported to the Secretary of the State’s Office.  The column labeled (AB) represents the number of Absentee Ballots counted on Election Day.  The column labeled (EDR) represents the number of Election Day Registration ballots counted.

 

Wallingford

25256

11163

44.20%

 

 

TOWN

Total Names on Registry List

Total Names Checked as Voting

Turnout Percentage

AB

EDR

Bridgewater

1331

1030

77.39%

   

Warren

1003

573

57.13%

21

11

Sharon

1740

983

56.49%

116

 

Cornwall

985

532

54.01%

   

Sprague

1732

922

53.23%

 

12

New Hartford

4573

2311

50.54%

 

30

East Haven

15176

7658

50.46%

   

Hampton

1193

596

49.96%

   

Harwinton

4059

2015

49.64%

   

Sherman

2600

1275

49.04%

126

9

Orange

10330

5014

48.54%

241

40

Wolcott

11233

5429

48.33%

254

35

Goshen

2172

1048

48.25%

   

Beacon Falls

3858

1861

48.24%

   

Killingworth

4266

2054

48.15%

   

Middlefield

3213

1545

48.09%

 

5

Derby

6555

3090

47.14%

 

11

Westport

16994

7961

46.85%

 

34

Morris

1697

786

46.32%

 

4

Prospect

6220

2872

46.17%

   

Bozrah

1709

786

45.99%

 

7

Woodbury

6770

3098

45.76%

   

Bolton

3336

1523

45.65%

 

5

Easton

5176

2351

45.42%

   

Cheshire

18706

8375

44.77%

367

 

Stafford

7543

3374

44.73%

169

20

Pomfret

2520

1123

44.56%

 

4

Roxbury

1695

750

44.25%

   

Wallingford

25256

11163

44.20%

 

43

Bethlehem

2782

1228

44.14%

 

6

West Haven

29147

12813

43.96%

   

Haddam

5860

2565

43.77%

 

9

Brookfield

9769

4274

43.75%

185

15

Ansonia

9790

4246

43.37%

   

Canterbury

3376

1451

42.98%

   

Clinton

9213

3937

42.73%

   

Branford

18140

7701

42.45%

 

23

Westbrook

4201

1779

42.35%

72

8

North Stonington

3778

1584

41.93%

   

Thomaston

4818

2008

41.68%

67

9

Salisbury

2940

1197

40.71%

 

15

Trumbull

24401

9852

40.38%

   

Guilford

14804

5949

40.19%

 

25

Monroe

11778

4716

40.04%

 

15

East Granby

3477

1384

39.80%

   

Simsbury

16096

6403

39.78%

   

Granby

7106

2805

39.47%

 

8

Stonington

12459

4916

39.46%

   

Washington

2403

948

39.45%

50

4

Chaplin

1355

525

38.75%

 

2

Redding

6987

2694

38.56%

   

New Britain

25211

9568

37.95%

 

164

Norwalk

44407

16781

37.79%

 

81

East Hampton

8426

3181

37.75%

95

20

Bethel

24181

9124

37.73%

156

 

Sterling

2150

811

37.72%

   

Oxford

8552

3225

37.71%

 

10

Greenwich

32152

11934

37.12%

 

40

Suffield

8390

3110

37.07%

 

15

Winchester

6837

2521

36.87%

76

16

Southbury

13773

5078

36.87%

   

Salem

2773

1022

36.86%

   

Shelton

23821

8686

36.46%

   

Essex

4620

1675

36.26%

   

Lebanon

4666

1689

36.20%

46

6

Windsor Locks

7387

2666

36.09%

   

Lisbon

2608

938

35.97%

 

5

Milford

33275

11927

35.84%

   

Somers

6384

2273

35.60%

72

11

Stamford

60604

21441

35.38%

 

61

Rocky Hill

11563

4030

34.85%

   

Hamden

33475

11649

34.80%

   

Newington

17329

6030

34.80%

 

24

Putnam

5159

1785

34.60%

   

Torrington

18985

6531

34.40%

 

30

Canaan

759

260

34.26%

8

3

Plymouth

7494

2567

34.25%

   

Avon

11939

4089

34.25%

 

22

Thompson

5321

1817

34.15%

 

8

Columbia

3562

1216

34.14%

   

Colchester

10105

3448

34.12%

 

10

Southington

25824

8749

33.88%

 

41

Willington

3574

1192

33.35%

 

5

Franklin

1212

404

33.33%

   

Bristol

33255

11021

33.14%

   

Middletown

22053

7303

33.12%

   

Stratford

31877

10556

33.11%

 

40

Danbury

34286

11304

32.97%

 

36

Vernon

15746

5149

32.70%

   

Cromwell

9304

3042

32.70%

 

21

Berlin

12891

4214

32.69%

   

New Fairfield

9569

3090

32.29%

   

Tolland

9409

3037

32.28%

62

5

South Windsor

15780

5091

32.26%

   

North Haven

15342

4918

32.06%

 

10

Weston

6674

2134

31.97%

112

22

Madison

13347

4262

31.93%

   

Griswold

6676

2123

31.80%

   

Burlington

6117

1941

31.73%

 

5

Deep River

3143

994

31.63%

36

4

North Branford

8925

2781

31.16%

   

Brooklyn

4754

1464

30.80%

   

Kent

1935

584

30.18%

27

 

Farmington

17246

5204

30.18%

 

22

Darien

12249

3659

29.87%

   

East Haddam

5767

1722

29.86%

48

5

Wethersfield

17282

5155

29.83%

 

12

Seymour

9518

2825

29.68%

   

Enfield

21698

6426

29.62%

   

Watertown

14434

4272

29.60%

 

37

Eastford

1176

347

29.51%

   

Fairfield

36839

10775

29.25%

   

New Haven

72278

21120

29.22%

 

202

Marlborough

4159

1204

28.95%

 

3

East Lyme

12047

3457

28.70%

   

Barkhamsted

2646

747

28.23%

   

Naugatuck

17507

4903

28.01%

 

35

Preston

3239

907

28.00%

   

Montville

9792

2723

27.81%

   

West Hartford

38826

10727

27.63%

   

Manchester

28876

7889

27.32%

   

Coventry

7620

2069

27.15%

   

Windsor

20264

5490

27.09%

268

20

Portland

5932

1593

26.85%

   

Meriden

29416

7887

26.81%

   

Groton

19082

5106

26.76%

   

Mansfield

11269

3010

26.71%

   

New Canaan

13132

3481

26.51%

   

Plainville

10599

2795

26.37%

   

Norfolk

1131

297

26.26%

15

 

Old Lyme

6068

1591

26.22%

 

4

Newtown

17346

4438

25.59%

   

Ellington

9594

2415

25.17%

   

East Windsor

3827

959

25.06%

14

2

Litchfield

6405

1567

24.47%

 

2

Ledyard

9006

2199

24.42%

 

12

Old Saybrook

7448

1818

24.41%

 

5

Bloomfield

12772

3094

24.22%

   

Windham

10981

2653

24.16%

   

Glastonbury

21803

5266

24.15%

   

Ridgefield

16681

4020

24.10%

 

11

Ashford

2808

671

23.90%

   

Durham

5074

1187

23.39%

46

3

New Milford

18370

4290

23.35%

61

 

Norwich

19796

4573

23.10%

 

23

Waterbury

56470

12732

22.55%

 

39

North Canaan

1968

440

22.36%

15

5

Hartland

1534

339

22.10%

 

1

Middlebury

5195

1124

21.64%

 

3

Hebron

6426

1388

21.60%

30

 

Waterford

12810

2712

21.17%

 

9

New London

14245

2986

20.96%

   

Voluntown

1643

320

19.48%

   

Canton

6973

1349

19.35%

42

3

Colebrook

1079

206

19.09%

   

Woodstock

4983

927

18.60%

   

East Hartford

26920

4894

18.18%

   

Killingly

9222

1636

17.74%

   

Lyme

1782

276

15.49%

 

1

Scotland

1107

171

15.45%

   

Chester

2444

346

14.16%

 

1

Plainfield

8652

1070

12.37%

   

Bridgeport

70322

8161

11.61%

   

Wilton

11463

1320

11.52%

 

6

Hartford

47031

2449

5.21%

   
           

Total Statewide Turnout

2020194

634875

31.43%

   

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Wallingford Voter registration / special registration session


WALLINGFORD
— The Wallingford registrars of voters will have a special registration session from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Saturday, Oct. 19, in the registrars office, Wallingford Town Hall, Room 211. Voters are reminded that only the town clerk can provide applications for absentee ballots, which must be returned to the town clerk.

If you're not registered at all Here's a link to the voter registration form - you can mail or bring in to the office:

http://www.town.wallingford.ct.us/images/customer-files/CT_Voter_Registration_Form.pdf

It must be postmarked by Oct 22. Otherwise you can come into the office in-person by Oct 29th.

TOWN COUNCIL CANDIDATE FORUM PART ONE - Wallingford Candidates forum – Election 2013

WALLINGFORD — The Wallingford Community Women’s Club held the 2013 candidates forum on Tuesday, Oct. 15 in the Town Council Chambers of the Wallingford Town Hall.

Reporters from local newspapers, in addition to students from Sheehan High School, addressed questions to the candidates.

This session was the Town Council Candidate forum PART ONE


TOWN COUNCIL CANDIDATE FORUM PART TWO - Wallingford Candidates forum – Election 2013

WALLINGFORD — The Wallingford Community Women’s Club held the 2013 candidates forum on Tuesday, Oct. 15 in the Town Council Chambers of the Wallingford Town Hall.

Reporters from local newspapers, in addition to students from Sheehan High School, addressed questions to the candidates.

This session was the Town Council Candidate forum PART TWO

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Wallingford Candidates forum – Election 2013

WALLINGFORD — The Wallingford Community Women’s Club announces the upcoming 2013 candidates forum on Tuesday, Oct. 15, and Thursday, Oct. 17, in the Town Council Chambers of the Wallingford Town Hall.

Reporters from local newspapers, in addition to students from Sheehan High School, will address questions to the candidates. The Tuesday sessions, at 7 and 8 p.m., are for the 13 candidates for the Town Council. At 9 p.m. the two mayoral candidates will be questioned. Thursday’s sessions, at 7 and 8 p.m., are for the 12 candidates for the Board of Education.

The sessions will be taped and available for viewing shortly afterward on government access channel 20. The public is welcome to attend all sessions.

Friday, October 11, 2013

Absentee Ballot Application English and Spanish


Application for Absentee Ballot: This application for absentee ballot may be downloaded by an individual for: (1) the individual's own use; (2) the use of a member of the individual's immediate family; or (3) the use of a designee of the applicant. Any person who will distribute five (5) or more absentee ballot applications to persons other than the individual's immediate family must register with and obtain forms from the Town Clerk of the municipality where such forms will be distributed before distributing such forms. For more detailed information please review the Absentee Ballot Fact Sheet and Absentee Ballot Application Process document.

 
English:
 
Spanish:

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Wallingford Community Women Candidate Forum for the 2013 election

The Wallingford Community Women will be sponsoring the Candidate Forum for the 2013 election on Tuesday October 15 and Thursday October 17 in the Town Council chambers at Wallingford Town Hall

TUESDAY FROM 7-8 (first session) / 8-9 (second session) TOWN COUNCIL CANDIDATES

TUESDAY FROM 9-10 - MAYORAL CANDIDATES

THURSDAY 7-8 (first session) / 8-9 (second session) BOARD OF EDUCATION CANDIDATES

The public is invited and encouraged to attend.

I am planning to get the recordings of the forum and post them here on the blog as soon as they are available.

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Councilors spar over meeting agenda

image

The Wednesday October 9, 2013 issue of the Record Journal carried a story titled Councilors spar over meeting agenda.

The article basically outlines the current situation where Town Councilor Nick Economopoulos was denied the opportunity to place an item on the agenda for Tuesday’s Town Council meeting.

The Chairman of the Town Council Robert Parisi and the Vice Chair Vincent Cervoni indicated they would not add the item to the agenda – their reasoning was that nothing new was to be added to the discussion.

If you look at the Town Council rules of procedure at the top of the article the reasons available to decline an item “The Council Chairman can grant exceptions to this rule, depending on the length of a given Town Council agenda.” I read this as a compound reason – Length is the reason for the exception.

Tuesday’s meeting had a normal amount of items and we were wrapped up around 9PM; we’ve had meetings that have gone longer with less items and had other meetings with more items in general.

This goes back to the need for a more transparent local Government. More on that soon.

I will also follow up more on item 4 above as well:

”Public input on individual agenda items will be received during the discussion of the specific item, after members of the Council have had an opportunity to review and discuss the item. Individuals wishing to speak to individual agenda items will be required to address their questions or comments to the Council Chairman and limit his/ her speaking time to a total of three minutes.”

This rule has been specifically and intentionally ignored on a number of occasions and the public was not allowed to speak.

Monday, October 7, 2013

Wallingford turnout for local elections since 2001; updated for 2013 results

2001
Town of Wallingford total number of names on official check list:
25,635    
Town of Wallingford total number of names checked as having voted: 11,036
Town of Wallingford turnout percentage: 43.1%


2003
Town of Wallingford total number of names on official check list:
24,825    
Town of Wallingford total number of names checked as having voted: 12,389
Town of Wallingford turnout percentage: 49.9%


2005
Town of Wallingford total number of names on official check list:
26,718    
Town of Wallingford total number of names checked as having voted: 12,719
Town of Wallingford turnout percentage: 47.6%


2007
Town of Wallingford total number of names on official check list:
25,461    
Town of Wallingford total number of names checked as having voted: 11,624
Town of Wallingford turnout percentage: 45.7%


2009
Town of Wallingford total number of names on official check list:
24,870    
Town of Wallingford total number of names checked as having voted: 8,850
Town of Wallingford turnout percentage: 35.6%

2011  
Town of Wallingford total number of names on official check list: 24,731    

Town of Wallingford total number of names checked as having voted: 9,783
Town of Wallingford turnout percentage: 39.5%

2013  
Town of Wallingford total number of names on official check list: 25,256    

Town of Wallingford total number of names checked as having voted: 11,163
Town of Wallingford turnout percentage: 44.2%

Monday, September 9, 2013

Sign, sign everywhere a sign; PZC meeting discussing signs INSIDE store windows

From the conversation on Facebook I started where one person’s opinion / argument attempted to clear up a misconception that signs inside of stores were not going to be discussed, that “The long and the short of it is that there is nothing on the horizon for the P&Z to consider mandating town-wide regulation of interior signage”…. I am sitting in the meeting two weeks after the discussion thread, where they are discussing just that.

image

image

image

image

image

By the way dear readers, Craig was not here this evening.