Search This Blog

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

‘Most people like what the two Marys are doing’ - Mushinsky and Fritz are in for the long haul

As published in the Record Journal Saturday November 10, 2012

By Laurie Rich Salerno
Record-Journal staff
lsalerno@record-journal.com
(203) 317-2235
Twitter:@LaurieSalernoRJ

WALLINGFORD - Democrat Mary Mushinsky is poised to tie for longest-serving state representative in the records of the Connecticut State Library.

If she completes the two-year term in the 85th District that she was elected to Tuesday, she will have served in the house for 34 years — as long as Richard O. Belden, a Republican who represented Shelton from 1975 until his death in 2007 at age 73. The library’s database goes back to 1849 for House members.

“I don’t go looking that stuff up, but I know I’ve been there a long time,” Mushinsky, 60, said last week after being told about the record.

“It’s interesting; I never would’ve thought it — I didn’t get into politics intentionally,” said Mushinsky, a former activist who one day decided she might make more of an impact as a legislator.

Apparently a town of steady habits, Wallingford has a couple more high profile, longtime incumbents in 28 year state Rep. Mary Fritz, 74, a fellow Democrat who also won re-election in her 90th District this week, and Mayor William W. Dickinson Jr., 64, the Republican who has been in power for 31 years and is the second-longest serving mayor in the state now in the role. Prospect’s Mayor Bob Chatfield, who was first elected in 1978, is the only mayor now in office who has served longer.

The analysts and those involved in town politics who were interviewed say they don’t think the interest in reelecting incumbents necessarily has to do with the community; rather, it’s the strength of the candidates themselves.

“If they do a good job, and people like the job they’re doing, they’ll get re-elected,” said Republican Town Chairman Bob Prentice, whose two Republican candidates, Greg Bachand and Guy Darter, were beaten Tuesday by Mushinsky and Fritz. “Most people like what the two Marys are doing. I don’t always agree with what they do — but I’ve only got one vote.”

His counterpart, Democratic Town Chairman Vincent Avallone, credited Fritz and Mushinsky’s repeated wins to their hard work in office.

“They’re just what representatives should be. They’re in touch with their constituents, they return phone calls — they help to solve problems and they’re sincere,” he said. About Dickinson and the Republican majority on the Town Council, he said, “It’s been very hard to defeat the mayor — he has a coattail effect.” But Avallone said he believes his party is strengthening in local elections.

Sacred Heart University government and politics professor Gary Rose, who lives in Cheshire, said incumbents often have an advantage on Election Day.

“Once these people get in office ... and they have their staffs up in Hartford, they know who all the voters are,” Rose said. “They are almost like little machines. They really are part of the community — they know exactly how to work the community.”

Though there’s an inherent advantage, Rose, too, credits the work and attitude of individual politicians with their own career longevity. As for why these politicians, despite their success, would not seek higher office, he said these people tend to believe the adage that all politics is local and would like to stay where they are.

“The people that run for higher office tend to be of a different type of ilk — more money, higher aspirations,” Rose said, whereas long-term incumbents find themselves with seniority and clout in the legislature. “It’s a gamble when you start to do that.”

Fritz said she never sought to move up because she liked the close contact with her constituents as a state representative and wanted to be around for her family.

“It’s because I really like what I do — and because it’s a (population) of about 22,000. I’m not that far removed from them. And at the same time, we raised six children ...” Fritz said.

Mushinsky, who has two sons with her husband, Martin J. Waters, said she has been asked, but the timing to run for a higher role was never right for her family.

“If you lose ... and you don’t have something else lined up and you’re not independently wealthy — and I’m not — it’s a big gamble,” Mushinsky said. “I think that what I work at now is what I’m good at.”

As for new blood bringing fresh ideas, something Bachand hammered away at in his campaign, the incumbents interviewed said their years of experience were invaluable.

“Experience is important. Government is becoming ever more complex, experience does play a role,” Dickinson said. “Having a feel for what’s needed, what the laws provide, what changes in law may be having an effect.”

Monday, November 12, 2012

This week in Wallingford – November 12, 2012

As published in the Record Journal Monday November 12, 2012

Monday : No meetings scheduled.

Tuesday : Public Celebrations Committee , 5:30 p.m., Town Hall, Room 205, 45 S. Main St.;
Town Council ,
6:30 p.m., Town Hall, Auditorium.

Wednesday :
Parks and Recreation Commission ,
8 a.m., Doherty Municipal Bldg., 6 Fairfield Boulevard;
Planning and Zoning Commission ,
7 p.m., Town Hall, Auditorium.

Thursday : School Roof Building Committee , 6:30 p.m., Sheehan High School, 142 Hope Hill Road, Board of Education Conference Room.

Friday : Committee on Aging , noon, Senior Center, 238 Washington St.

Friday, November 9, 2012

Officials question design of grade crossing

As published in the Record Journal Friday November 9, 2012

By Russell Blair
Record-Journal staff
rblair@record-journal.com
(203) 317-2225
Twitter:@RussellBlairRJ

WALLINGFORD — Town officials have questions about preliminary designs for rail crossings that include median dividers that would limit or eliminate access to some commercial driveways.

Town Engineer John Thompson said Thursday that he had reviewed plans from the state Department of Transportation for seven redesigned rail crossings as part of the New Haven-to-Springfield high-speed rail line and wrote a letter this week expressing his concerns.

State plans call for “non mountable curb islands” down the middle of several streets as they approach the tracks. Thompson said he understands the reasoning behind the curb islands — to prevent drivers from using the opposite lane to get around the crossing gates — but he’s worried they could slow down emergency vehicles.

“Even when the gates go up, it takes time for traffic to dissipate,” Thompson said. “Emergency vehicles can use the opposing lane with lights and siren. The median would have a negative impact. They would be trapped behind the waiting vehicles.”

The medians are not large, concrete Jersey barriers, but are similar to a raised curb, according to DOT Project Manager John Bernick. Plans for one of the crossings call for a 60-foot-long center island.

“They’re high enough to bottom out a passenger car, but I believe an emergency vehicle with high enough clearance could get over it if they had to,” he said.

In his letter Thompson said that the Fire Department had come up with two suggestions for alleviating the problem, including an emergency vehicle sequence that would use traffic lights to open up Hall Avenue for passage or the inclusion of an emergency vehicle travel lane on Hall Avenue that could be used to bypass traffic. The state has also proposed closing some commercial driveways along the rail route. Other businesses could be affected because the medians would prevent patrons from making a left-hand turn.

“Part of my job as town engineer is to make sure the proposals are not adversely affecting local businesses,” Thompson said.

One of the affected businesses would be the Dairy Queen at the corner of Ward Street and Route 5. The preliminary plans call for a median divider running along Ward Street between Route 5 and the railroad tracks. The barrier means drivers couldn’t make a left-hand turn out of Dairy Queen’s rear parking lot.

“It would be detrimental to business,” said Dairy Queen owner Ron Sotere. “I’m absolutely against it. I’ve been here 50 years and we’ve never had a problem.”

Bernick said the medians were part of an increase in safety measures along the upgraded rail line. Municipalities can apply for a quiet zone waiver, which means trains won’t blow the horn each time they approach a crossing. In lieu of the horn, additional safety measures, such as the median curb islands, are required.

“The additional safety measures make up for the fact that the train horn wouldn’t sound,” Bernick said. “The safety remains the same or better.”

Bernick said the plans are preliminary, not final, and there will be opportunity for public comment this winter or next spring.

Thompson said he looks forward to discussions with the state.

“We’ll continue to work with them so we’re all on the same page,” he said. “This project is a big deal. It’s going to be around for a long time.”

Thursday, November 8, 2012

Presidential Vote totals (as I have them) on 11/8 (includes battleground state information).

image

WALLINGFORD - Officials plan to resume discussions about Incentive Housing Zone

As published in the Record Journal Sunday November 4, 2012

By Laurie Rich Salerno
Record-Journal staff
lsalerno@record-journal.com
(203) 317-2235
Twitter:@LaurieSalernoRJ

WALLINGFORD - Though a November meeting on the topic was canceled, the Town Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission still plan to revisit the creation of an Incentive Housing Zone that could spur redevelopment in downtown Wallingford.

The Council announced at its Oct. 23 meeting that it had set a workshop with the Commission for Nov. 20, but it was canceled due to conflicts. The two groups are still working on a date, anticipating a meeting either late this year or just after the holidays.

Some town councilors are interested in discussing a plan, with some saying they were frustrated that the meeting was taking so long to put together.

Councilor John Sullivan, a Democrat, said he would like to discuss the plan quickly.

“I want what’s best for the town — that area right now probably needs a facelift,” Sullivan said. “I think we have a great opportunity here with the transportation systems already in place and with high speed rail coming in as well.”

Proposals for the Incentive Housing Zone have been around since early 2008, when former Town Planner Linda Bush presented the idea of creating an overlay zone for a 23.3-acre swath of downtown Wallingford that would allow the development of mixed-use commercial and high-density residential properties. Plans called for the zone to include Quinnipiac Street, North Cherry Street, Hall Avenue, Meadow Street, North Colony and Center streets.

The zone would fall under an Office of Policy and Management program called Home Connecticut, which was approved in 2007 by the state legislature and would require the area to be 20 percent comprised of affordable housing. The state would pay $2,000 for each potential housing unit — 361 in Wallingford — and then another $2,000 for each unit that eventually is constructed.

Though the plans were initially approved by the Town Council in 2009 and submitted to OPM four times between April 2009 and July 2010, according to Acting Town Planner Kacie Costello, OPM did not have funding available for the program until the fall of 2010 — after a new council had been elected. That new council needed to reapprove the plan for it to be submitted, but instead deadlocked 4-4, and the Planning and Zoning Commission took the plan back for revision.

Though it has taken two years, Costello and commission members say the plan has never been off the table, and that they’ve been working on the project.

James Fitzsimmons, a Planning and Zoning commissioner, is a proponent of the plan — anything that brings affordable housing to downtown,he said. Fitzsimmons said he thought the zone could have the same effect as the Yalesville Limited Business District, which the town created through zoning about 20 years ago.

“I would compare it to what happened in Yalesville … it allowed more residential development, higher density. In the Yalesville area, you’ve seen an explosion over the years of condominiums and development,” Fitzsimmons said.

Some town councilors were more tentative in their interest in the plan.

“I like the concept,” said Councilor Vincent Cervoni, a Republican, but he added that he didn’t think the amount of money offered to the town would make a vast difference. He’d also like to see the town have more control over what is put there. Rather than a zone in which people can build by just complying with set-down regulations, he’d like builders to come to the town with projects and ask for permits.

“I’d like to see an overlay by special exception — because I think we should retain a little bit of control down there,” Cervoni said. “I’d hate to see it go the wrong way.”

Costello said the plans they’ll be presenting include changes from the original in an effort to address some of the concerns that have been voiced, such as Cervoni’s interest in having town approval over projects.

Though the requirements of the Home Program say there cannot be such a permitting process, Costello said the staff has spent time closely examining regulations so that they can put regulations in place “in a way that pre-addresses those issues.” Plans now also reflect a change in the accepted height of buildings — from four stories to three. Costello said the department was looking at the North Main Street and Center Street intersection, where “there are a number of three or even four-story buildings. That’s what we’re trying to accomplish.”

She said that although the town has approved a different site for its new train station to be built — on Parker Street, north of the current site between Quinnipiac and Hall Avenues — the planned zone at this juncture will not move.

File photos courtesy of the Record-Journal

The lot at 63 N. Cherry St., top, and the site of the old T-Bonz Bar & Grill at 28 Quinnipiac St., bottom, are properties being eyed in a proposed Incentive Housing Zone to aid the development of downtown Wallingford. Both photographs were taken on Jan. 29, 2008.

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Wallingford DTC Projected numbers for US Congress District 3 (UNOFFICIAL)

WINNER – ROSA DELAURO

image

Wallingford DTC Projected numbers for US Senate (UNOFFICIAL)

WINNER – CHRIS MURPHY

image

Wallingford DTC Projected numbers for President of the United States (UNOFFICIAL)

image

Wallingford DTC Projected numbers for 90th District (UNOFFICIAL)

WINNER – MARY FRITZ

image

Wallingford DTC Projected numbers for 85th District (UNOFFICIAL)

WINNER – MARY MUSHINSKY

image

Wallingford – 2nd District numbers are in…. other numbers are coming

JOIN US FOR OUR ELECTION NIGHT PARTY!

The Italian-American Club

Libero Pensiero Mutual Aid Society

91 Dudley Avenue

Wallingford, CT

Tuesday, November 6th, 2012

8:00PM - 10:00PM

The Wallingford Democrats are reviewing election results TONIGHT at the Libero Pensiero Mutual Aid Society (Italian-American Club)

JOIN US FOR OUR ELECTION NIGHT PARTY!

The Italian-American Club

Libero Pensiero Mutual Aid Society

91 Dudley Avenue

Wallingford, CT

Tuesday, November 6th, 2012

8:00PM - 10:00PM

VOTE - IT MATTERS

Wallingford Democratic ride to the polls

WALLINGFORD VOTING LOCATIONS FOR TUESDAY NOVEMBER 6, 2012

As published in the Record Journal Sunday November 4, 2012

Assembly District 85:
District 2: Stevens School gym, 18 Kondracki Lane.
District 3: Moses Y. Beach School gym, 340 N. Main St.
District 4: Dag Middle School gym, 106 Pond Hill Road. District 5: Cook Hill School gym, 57 Hall Road.

Assembly District 86:
District 1: Pond Hill School gym, 297 Pond Hill Road.

Assembly District 90:
District 7: Yalesville School cafeteria, 415 Church St. (Rte. 68). District 8: Senior Center, 238 Washington St.
District 9: Rock Hill School cafeteria, 911 Durham Road.

Assembly District 103:
District 6: Parker Farms School cafeteria, 30 Parker Farms Road.

Voter information: (203) 294-2125

Endorsed by the Record Journal - Obama for President

As published on Monday November 5, 2012

Winds of change were at our doorstep this week in the form of Hurricane Sandy and its powerful impact on daily lives of citizens along the eastern U.S. seaboard and beyond. To his considerable credit, President Barack Obama’s focus was on the well-being of the nation throughout, setting aside campaign appointments in favor of exercising strong leadership. (Quite unlike his counterpart, Republican former-President George Bush, who was woefully ill-prepared and unfocused with the advent of Hurricane Katrina — the lingering, baneful results of which have been acutely felt.) Appropriate, decisive action in such situations lends impetus, then, to central government’s integral function in American society.

Until the first of three debates, incumbent Democratic President Obama had been generally leading, sometimes by wide margins, in election polls over his challenger, Republican former-Governor Mitt Romney. Consensus solidly declared Romney victor of the first (with Obama seemingly detached from the spirit of this encounter). Thereafter, Obama rose like a Phoenix from the ashes of debate, setting the record straight while championing his cause persuasively in rounds two and three.

A president’s function is, however, not about debate but leadership — making profoundly difficult decisions (ones sometimes politically unpopular or even at odds within his own party). Such far reaching policies guide our nation in matters of war and peace, international policy, economic prosperity, as well as Americans’ health, general safety and well-being among significant, numerous considerations.

Chief among credential cornerstones for presidential elected office is overall consistency and steadfastness at the helm of governmental rule. These qualities Obama has demonstrated with well-reasoned aplomb even as Romney has been at sixes-and-sevens flip-flopping on issues from this season’s vitriolic Republican primary until the present.

Americans of varying political stripes, including members of his own Republican Party, rightly took umbrage with Romney over his recorded declaration that 47 percent of us are lazy slackers, mooching on the largess of government. This overt lack of caring for those relying on safety nets — including veterans, the permanently disabled, seniors on fixed incomes and those who simply can’t get or afford health care — should give voters pause.

Sorry, but, as Obama avers, returning to the Gilded Age is not the answer. Let’s not attempt to voucherize, privatize or systematically end beneficial safety net programs while enriching corporations and one-per-centers’ lavish tax breaks and accommodating loopholes. Instead, modify that which needs fixing by achieving fair, sustainable, humane, bipartisan compromise.

Obama’s impressive record includes: thwarting a potentially massive economic Depression and banking/financial system collapse (inherited from the previous Republican two-term administration), ending the Iraq war, saving America’s auto industry, strengthening international alliances while zeroing-in on terrorists, killing bin Laden, championing the cause of America’s health care and ending an absurd “don’t ask, don’t tell” military policy. By contrast, polls indicate that Romney’s “trust me” appeal to would-be voters is working, though bereft of policy specifics. It’s difficult to see how what he proffers will, in the practical, create 12 million jobs, or how not asking those exceedingly wealthy to do a little more will magically benefit America’s middle class and reduce deficits. It’s a quantum leap of illogic, far eclipsing Bush’s “fuzzy math,” as evidenced by Romney’s insistence that he can miraculously cut taxes, increase spending (especially military) yet achieve budget balance.

There exists an inexhaustible litany, vis-à-vis points of difference. For some, it’s pre-existent, deep-seated resentment that Obama won the White House. For others, it may be individual social liberal vs. conservative issues which drive a stake into the heart of productive discourse while generating electoral rancor and polarizing politics. Meeting half-way on the bridge of bipartisanship has all-but become a lost art of statesmanship.

It took years to create the mess Obama has been dealing with assiduously and painstakingly from day one in office. He admits freely to areas, especially jobs and the economy, needing improvement. Still, improving they are.

No human, no president is perfect. But Obama’s seasoned success and overall wise, thoughtful leadership coupled to his undeniable determination for excellence cause us to endorse him for a second term.

 

Monday, November 5, 2012

ENDORSEMENT–RECORD JOURNAL - Chris Murphy for U.S. Senate

AS PUBLISHED IN THE RECORD JOURNAL SUNDAY NOVEMBER 4, 2012

The race between Democratic Congressman Chris Murphy and Republican super-wealthy businesswoman Linda McMahon for Connecticut’s U.S. Senate seat has drawn intense national attention. Its fate, along with a few other key senate races (such as the Massachusetts counterpart between incumbent Republican Senator Scott Brown and Democrat challenger Elizabeth Warren), could prove instrumental in shifting balance of Senate power from Democrat to Republican.

Voters in Connecticut have been bombarded with a relentless (if not shameless and baseless) snail mail assault against Murphy by McMahon in this tight race. (Murphy has estimated that McMahon, the former wrestling executive, will loan herself over $70 million before the campaign is over.) McMahon’s seemingly inexhaustible personal fortune may buy a blitzkrieg of negative advertising (the majority of which mentions nothing of her own platform) relative to Murphy’s modest repudiations, but it can’t buy her credentials. Connecticut’s prominent legislative seat demands a Senator with experience, bipartisan inclination and ability to relate to every-day constituents beyond token gestures and manufactured platitudes.

Regarding her foray into senatorial politics two years (when running against Democrat Richard Blumenthal), Providence Journal columnist Froma Harrop observed: “Linda McMahon poses in her campaign ads as a tweedy suburban matron. But she and her husband made their fortune on World Wrestling Entertainment, which traffics in steroids, dirty language, sex and violence . . . We’ve seen the video of husband Vince McMahon in the ring, ordering a female wrestler to disrobe, get on her knees and ‘bark like a dog.’ We’ve seen Linda herself kicking a man in the groin. That the couple named their yacht Sexy Bitch is an especially nice touch.”

If being super-wealthy confers McMahon’s self proclaimed but highly dubious job-creator status, voters may wish to question the type of employment in which she has engaged. Business acumen which might otherwise prove an asset in some circles doesn’t necessarily translate to senatorial firing power.

To his credit, Murphy doesn’t share McMahon’s trickle-down economics view and zeal for repealing or substantially diluting provisions in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act aimed at regulating Wall Street in the wake of the 2008 recession. While McMahon’s emphasis is on further corporate tax benefits while furthering those which principally benefit America’s rich, Murphy’s moderate approach would not attempt to undo legislation designed to spare us from the precipice of financial meltdown. (Recall the legacy handed to President Obama from Republicans upon his inauguration.) Likewise, McMahon has said she supports repealing the health care law, calling it a waste of money. Murphy and others have said that’s not the case and the law would provide portable health care coverage for millions (along with innumerable other benefits yet to be realized as implementation renders specious, politically-motivated arguments academic). If portions of the Affordable Care Act need refinement over time, so be it. As Murphy avers, repeal is not the answer.

Murphy’s four years in Congress do not make him a long-term insider. However, they have inculcated insight — credentials critical for consideration of international policy as well as pragmatic vis-à-vis advancing legislation aimed at improving the economy, jobs, infrastructure, energy and myriad policy discussions on Capitol Hill.

Unlike McMahon’s corporate “Smack Down” experience, wrestling with political issues and coming out the victor in many rounds is Murphy’s strong suit. We endorse Chris Murphy for U.S. Senate.

This week in Wallingford

As published in the Record Journal Monday November 5, 2012

WALLINGFORD — The Conservation Commission is set on Thursday to discuss ATV issues in the town’s open spaces and leased farmland.

Monday: No meetings scheduled.

Tuesday: No meetings scheduled.

Wednesday:
-- Personnel and Pension Appeals Board, 6:30 p.m., Town Hall, 45 S. Main St., Rm. 315
-- Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission, 7 p.m. Town Hall, Auditorium.

Thursday:
-- Pension Commission, 3 p.m., Town Hall, Room 315
-- Conservation Commission, 7 p.m., Town Hall, Basement Conference Room.

Friday: No meetings scheduled.




Mary Fritz – Democrat for State Representative in the 90th District

image

VIDEO - Connecticut 90th State Assembly District Forum: Mary Fritz and Guy Darter (2012)

Sunday, November 4, 2012

WALLINGFORD VOTING LOCATIONS FOR TUESDAY NOVEMBER 6, 2012

As published in the Record Journal Sunday November 4, 2012

Assembly District 85:
District 2: Stevens School gym, 18 Kondracki Lane.
District 3: Moses Y. Beach School gym, 340 N. Main St.
District 4: Dag Middle School gym, 106 Pond Hill Road. District 5: Cook Hill School gym, 57 Hall Road.

Assembly District 86:
District 1: Pond Hill School gym, 297 Pond Hill Road.

Assembly District 90:
District 7: Yalesville School cafeteria, 415 Church St. (Rte. 68). District 8: Senior Center, 238 Washington St.
District 9: Rock Hill School cafeteria, 911 Durham Road.

Assembly District 103:
District 6: Parker Farms School cafeteria, 30 Parker Farms Road.

Voter information: (203) 294-2125