Search This Blog

Friday, November 4, 2011

Record Journal Voter Guide for Wallingford: Democratic Candidate for Town Council Debi Reynolds

As published in the Record Journal Sunday October 30, 2011

imageAge: 59.

Address: 844 Old Durham Road.

Occupation: Business analyst, The Hartford.

Education: Maloney High School, Meriden.

Platform: Grow businesses to ease the tax burden on residents; address constituent questions and concerns with diligence and from the perspective of a hardworking resident.

Misc.: Married to Board of Education candidate Patrick Reynolds; mother of three and grandmother of two; former Wallingford Youth Soccer League coach, former group coordinator for Autism Speaks and former member Wallingford Land Trust.

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Record Journal Voter Guide for Wallingford: Democratic Candidate for Board of Education Kathy Castelli

As published in the Record Journal Sunday October 30, 2011

imageAge: 61.

Address: 9 Ashford Court.

Occupation: Retired.

Education: B.S., special education, Southern Connecticut State College.

Platform: Keep improving education in midst of funding limitations through creative solutions and close monitoring of the budget; increased use of technology to prepare students for global workforce.

Misc.: Seeking third term; former senior business analyst and senior quality assurance advisor at Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield; mother of five children that attended town schools; local resident since 1979.

Record Journal Voter Guide for Wallingford: Democratic Candidate for Town Council Donald Harwood

As published in the Record Journal Sunday October 30, 2011

image_thumbAge: 56.

Address: 14 Taylor Lane.

Occupation: Owner-operator, AMB Associates.

Education: A.S., criminology and marketing, Middlesex Community College; B.S., industrial technology, Central Connecticut State University.

Platform: Better strategic planning to contain costs and improve education, public safety, economic development, real estate and property management and town government efficiency.

Misc.: Member Strategic Planning Committee of Board of Education; was School Building Committee chairman during major district-wide renovations; past chief Yalesville Volunteer Fire Department; former Wallingford deputy fire marshal; 26-year member state building Codes and Standards Commission; member state fire training and prevention boards; ran unsuccessfully for council in 2009.

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Record Journal Voter Guide for Wallingford: Democratic Candidate for Town Council Nicholas Economopoulos

As published in the Record Journal Sunday October 30, 2011

image

Age: 62.

Address: 3 Woodmans Hill Road

Occupation: Retired.

Education: B.S., education, M.S., business education, Central Connecticut State University; M.S., educational administration, Southern Connecticut State University.

Platform: Develop goals for and improve management of town properties, including the creation of a buildings committee; conduct an efficiency study of town departments to find savings; do what's right above party and self.

Misc.: Seeking third council term; former business and accounting teacher at Lyman Hall High School; longtime high school girls' basketball coach; former Board of Education member.

Blackout business booming in Wallingford

As published in the Record Journal, Wednesday November 2, 2011

By Russell Blair
Record-Journal staff

WALLINGFORD — With large portions of Meriden, Southington and Cheshire still without power Tuesday after Saturday’s snowstorm, business was booming in Wallingford, where all but a few homes and businesses have their electricity back.

On Tuesday morning, more than 80 percent of Meriden remained without power, but as travelers on Route 5 crossed the Wallingford line, they saw working traffic lights, open businesses and long lines.

At the Dunkin’ Donuts at 1101 N. Colony Road, drive through traffic was backed up all the way to the road and the parking lot was full. Inside the restaurant, customers waited in a line that snaked throughout the lobby.

Victoria Brady, of Meriden, said she’s been without power since Saturday.

“And probably until the end of the week,” she added.

Brady saw the long line at the drive-through, and said she would rather wait inside the warm restaurant than outside in her car.

Throughout the outage, Brady said, she’s been stopping to get food “wherever I can find a place.”

While many customers without power were happy to find a place to get a hot meal or a cup of coffee, commuters on their way to work and regular customers were shocked by the increase in volume.

Lui Nobrega, of Wallingford, said he’d “never seen it this packed” at the North Colony Road Dunkin’ Donuts. Nobrega stopped at another Dunkin’ Donuts in town and turned away because of the line. Shortly after he entered his second Dunkin’ Donuts of the morning, he saw another extended line, turned around and left.

“It’s not happening,” he said. Jackie Branco, who works in Wallingford, also turned away from the North Colony Road Dunkin’ Donuts because of the long line.

“There’s lines like this all over, anywhere that’s serving breakfast,” she said.

Branco said she still had power at her Naugatuck home, so she didn’t mind a little inconvenience in her morning routine.

Maria Kyriakis, co-owner of Neptune House Restaurant and Diner, at 1086 N. Colony Road, said the restaurant has been “very busy” since the storm and she and her husband, Chris, were working around the clock.

“We’ve had people from Meriden, Cheshire, Southington, all the places that have been out,” she said.

The restaurant had extra employees working and was ordering extra supplies.

Kyriakis said her staff was trying to strike a balance between handling all the new customers as well as the regulars.

“The people we know, they’re like family,” she said. “We can only do so much. We’re trying the best we can.”

At Duchess Restaurant, at 124 Church St., Meriden resident Bob Martin was in a crowd of people stopping by for something to eat Tuesday morning. Martin said he had been without power since Saturday night at 11 p.m. Martin, who works in Wallingford, said he had made trips to other towns several times for gas and food.

“Pretty much only Wallingford has power,” he said. “About the only thing open in Meriden is the McDonald’s.”

Everywhere in the area he had been that had power was crowded.

“The lines are unbelievable,” he said.

At Holiday Cinemas, at 970 N. Colony Road, visits to the theater were up.

“It’s been a little crazy,” said Naomi Corso, a manager. “It’s more like what we see on the holidays.”

Corso said residents without power were coming to the movie theater to warm up, and with all local schools closed Tuesday many families with kids were stopping by.

“ ‘Puss in Boots’ sold out,” she said, referring to the children’s movie about a sword wielding cat.

Wallingford Electric Division, the municipal utility that covers the town, reported only 4,000 outages of the town’s 25,000 ratepayers at the peak of the storm. In a statement, the utility said it expected to restore power to all but 100 customers by midnight Tuesday. There is no estimate for when power will be restored completely.

By comparison, peak outages topped 24,000 in Meriden, 13,000 in Southington and 10,000 in Cheshire. Connecticut Light & Power Co., which covers the three municipalities, had not provided an estimated time for complete restoration as of Tuesday.

Wallingford Electric Division outshines the big boys

As published in the Record Journal Tuesday November 1, 2011

By Robert Cyr
Record-Journal staff
rcyr@record-journal.com
(203) 317-2224

WALLINGFORD — As larger electric companies in the state continue to report record-breaking power outages after the weekend snowstorm, Wallingford’s Electric Division has kept the lights on for most of its customers and has made the town something of an oasis for other communities without power.

The storm has been called far more severe and unexpected than Tropical Storm Irene in August, and Wallingford residents once again fared better than those of Connecticut Light & Power, which was working Monday to restore power to 60 percent of its customers, or 753,289 households statewide. At the height of the storm, about 4,000 customers of Wallingford’s public utility were without power; that number had been reduced to Monday morning, just 4 percent of the Electric Division’s 25,000 ratepayers.

Director of Public Utilities George Adair said there’s no secret to the division’s success, but he credited some of it to ongoing efforts to upgrade electric poles and aging hardware. Trees that could pose problems are also trimmed on a four-year cycle, he said, but he said he’s not certain that other utility companies don’t do the same thing.

“From the standpoint of the system itself, I think it’s well maintained,” he said. “I don’t think it’s necessarily unique. You start with the primary stuff and work your way out. We were fortunate in that we still have transmission service and we haven’t lost our ability to receive energy.”

The division buys its power from the Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative, but it is not a member. The cooperative, based in Norwich, provides electricity to more than 66,000 customers throughout the state.

Being in one of the few area towns with power has its advantages for some business owners.

Ray Porto and his grandson, Tom, were a busy duo on Monday at the Citgo service station at 480 N. Colony Road. Ray Porto said he’s owned the station for 65 years and would likely run out of gas today if his delivery was late.

With cars lined up and down the road to the station’s lot and blocking the bay doors, he was unable to open his garage to get cars in for service or get fixed cars out.

“This is unbelievable. I never went through what I’m going through right now,” he said. “People just want to get in here because they don’t want to run out of gas.

Tom Porto, working the counter, said he had customers drive from as far as Canton for gas for their cars and generators.

“I’ve never seen it like this,” he said. “We quadrupled our business, at least.”

Division officials said they hoped to get outages below 500 before the end of the day Monday. Crews from Groton Utilities helped Wallingford workers through Public Power Mutual Aid.

CL&P customers in Southington experienced 12,512 outages, or about 64 percent of the town. Almost all of Cheshire’s 11,236 customers — 92 percent, or 10,421 customers — were without power. Meriden also experienced widespread outages. As of Monday afternoon, 24,377 out of 27,670 customers had no electricity, according to the CL&P website.

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Record Journal Voter Guide for Wallingford: Democratic Candidate for Town Council John Sullivan

As published in the Record Journal Sunday October 30, 2011

imageAge: 52.

Address: 62 Dutton St.

Occupation: AT&T Chief of Staff Connecticut/Columbus-Dayton, Ohio.

Education: Attended Middlesex Community College and the University of New Haven.

Platform: Maintain tax rate; support public safety and economic development; develop a five- to 10-year downtown revitalization plan; make local government more efficient and user-friendly through technology; ensure adequate funding for school board's strategic plan; work in a bipartisan manner to benefit the town.

Misc.: Seeking second council term; hosted One on One political talk show on cable TV. Produced local sports programming.

Website:http://re-electcouncilorsullivan.blogspot.com/

Monday, October 31, 2011

Record Journal Voter Guide for Wallingford: Democratic Candidate for Mayor Vincent Testa

As published in the Record Journal Sunday October 30, 2011

imageVincent F. Testa (D)
Age: 51 Address: 15 East St.
Occupation: Mortgage broker.
Education: B.S., biology, Fairfield University.

Platform: Specific plan to target and recruit new businesses, including creation of clean energy research and development hub in industrial parks; improve technology and business operations in town government; restore paramedics and improve retention of police officers; share services between town and schools and improve public building maintenance to cut spending and ease tax burden; support schools' strategic plan.

Misc.: Town Council incumbent (fourth term) and minority leader; former Board of Education member; former substitute teacher at Dag Hammarskjold Middle School; pursuing teacher certification; board member Wallingford Symphony Orchestra, Child Guidance Clinic and Yalesville Little League; Wallingford Education Foundation golf tournament committee member; Business Network International development ambassador.

Website: www.vinnietestaformayor.com
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/pages/Vinnie-Testa-for-Mayor/118934548181765

Email:
vtesta@comcast.net

Friday, October 28, 2011

Video - Jason M. Zandri (D) – Candidate for Wallingford Town Council

Jason M. Zandri (D) – Candidate for Wallingford Town Council

The Simpson Court Referendum - The difference between misinformation and outright lying

IMAG0011

Let’s first define “public parking”.

Public parking means using the lots to park your car where you do not patronize any of the adjoining businesses. You park your car in the lot and walk away from all the businesses in the area. You park and leave your car and carpool with someone else to go somewhere. That is public parking.

Parking in the lots and then going into one of the businesses – that is customer parking.

When you go to Target and park in the lot to go into the business you are leveraging customer parking. If you leave your car in the Target parking lot and go with someone into their car elsewhere you are leveraging that parking lot as if it were public parking and you could be towed in theory if they were enforcing that.

We are not discussing customer parking; that is not at issue. For these property owners to lease their spaces for people to establish businesses there they must provide some minimum level of owner, leaser, and / or customer parking.

Now onto the heart of the matter – public parking.

“135 Free PARKING SPACES”

Let’s all forget about the $500,000.00 the town is talking about investing into these private owners’ properties over the next 30 years for a moment.

On a year to year basis for DECADES the Town of Wallingford has been putting tax dollars into these properties and other private lots downtown on behalf of the tax payers in exchange for public parking use. 

This has been mainly in the form of man hours from public works; plowing and sanding in the winter and other work throughout the year.

These actions and efforts have resulted in the expenditures of tax dollars.

That means these parking spaces have not been “FREE”.

With the decision as it currently rests from the vote of the Town Council, we are planning to enter into a 30 year lease with these private property owners where Wallingford will STILL be expending monies for regular maintenance and upkeep.

In addition to that, Wallingford will be investing, solely, up to $500,000.00 into period lighting, lot resurfacing, line repainting, other structural and integrity repairs without a single dime coming from any one of the four property owners.

How is this “135 Free PARKING SPACES”?

It is coming at the cost of tax dollars expended annually and other monies in lieu of taxes for capital expenditures.  

How is this “135 Free PARKING SPACES”?

How is it that the main drivers of this and the Support Our Downtown movement are (primarily) our conservative leaders in town? The ones that will generally claim that they are fiscally responsible with our tax dollars. Where we cannot raise taxes to spend on this and that in this economy. They are the same ones that say that everyone is struggling and where the elderly who have gone without cost of living adjustments over the past couple of years cannot bare the burden of any higher taxes.

Where are all those fiscal conservatives these days?

That’s right – many of them are out there telling you to vote no and support the council’s decision to spend your tax dollars on this benefit. A benefit that the property owners will enjoy as equally as Downtown Wallingford will.

Without those property owners investing a single dime to the effort.

So you see folks the “FREE” in “135 Free PARKING SPACES” is just that for those four property owners in that all of this benefit they are getting for free.

Think about that before you go out to vote on election day Tuesday November 8th for who will represent you over the next two years

You will also need to think about whether the council decision should stand at referendum on Monday November 14th.

If you support the town investing the tax dollars in this manner then you will vote NO to maintain the Council’s decision to move forward.

If you are against this expenditure, where Wallingford foots the entire bill and the property owners spend nothing then you would need to vote YES to repeal the Council’s decision.

It’s your town – get informed and get involved.

FACEBOOK - Wallingford Parking Lot Referendum - November 14, 2011

Question: Why should Wallingford spend upwards of $500,000.00 to improve private property at your expense? Answer: IT SHOULDN'T! On November 14th, Vote "YES" to Repeal the one-sided deal!

It’s your town – get informed, get involved and VOTE on November 14th

For more information see the Wallingford Parking Lot Referendum Facebook page or go to the 500K Private Parking Deal site.

image

image

image

Walllingford - Final voter registration session set

WALLINGFORD - Registrars of voters will conduct a final voter registration session from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. Tuesday in Room 211 at the Town Hall.

After 5 p.m., voters are asked to enter the building by the automatic door at the rear left corner of the Town Hall and take the elevator to the second floor.

Registrants are required to appear in person. Voters wishing an absentee ballot are asked to contact the town clerk’s office for an application.

Completed forms are to be returned to the town clerk’s office.

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Public Information Meeting PROJECT 148-202 Design Plans and Improvements to Route 68 at Route 150

There will be a meeting on Wednesday November 9th, 2011 regarding planned design improvements to Route 68 where it intersects with Route 150.

The meeting is to be held in an open forum for individual discussions with Department of Transportation officials at 6:30 in room 315 at the Wallingford Town Hall

There will be a formal presentation beginning at 7PM in room 315.

The general public is encouraged and invited to attend.

Written questions or comments can be submitted to:

Mr. Timothy M. Wilson
Manager of State Design
PO BOX 317546
Newington, CT 06131-7546

Email communications are also welcome via timothy.wilson@ct.gov

Plans are available for viewing at the Wallingford Town Hall in the Town Clerk’s office.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

FROM WALLINGFORD - The referendum on November 14

As published in the Record Journal, Sunday October 23, 2011.

citizenmike

This week’s FROM WALLINGFORD was written by Mike Brodinsky a former town councilor from Wallingford, chairman of the School Roof Building Committee, and host of public access show “Citizen Mike”

The Citizen Mike show airs on cable Channel 18 at 9 p.m. every night, except Sunday. It can also be viewed on demand at wpaa.tv. Comments or suggestions can be sent to citizenmiketv@gmail.com.

If you can’t catch the show on TV you can catch it online on their Video On Demand page.

The referendum on November 14 will decide whether the Town will spend up to $500,000 to build a parking lot in back of Simpson Court on privately-owned property the Town proposes to lease for 30 years.

The parking lot was originally proposed as an amenity. Desperate for a win at the polls, however, advocates for the project argue that this enhancement is actually a “need. ” If we do not have it, some claim, it will lead to inevitable economic decay in uptown Wallingford. That’s a scare tactic, just in time for Halloween. And, it’s quite a stretch.

To make their case, these advocates predict that the owners, without a long-term lease to the Town, would be irrational and commit financial hari-kari by preventing potential customers from parking behind Simpson Court. Their assumption is that the owners would act against their own interests, strangle commerce uptown, and be the instruments of their own demise.

The scare tacticians’ wildly speculative progression goes this way: It’s time to panic. If the Town does not build the new parking lot, the owners will opt out of their short term leases. By doing that, they take over from the Town all the costs for snowplowing, repairs, and maintenance for their property. They grow unhappy. They never expected those costs because they thought the taxpayers would assume them. In time, they come to believe that it is in their best interests to prevent the public from parking on their lots, because potential customers have become a liability. So they exclude the public and drive off their tenants’ customers and guests.

In the process, they undermine the economy of the uptown area, and the success of their own businesses. Wallingford Center is finished. That’s a wild story but it reflects their logic.

Advocates of the project also fail to explain the impact of the planning and zoning regulations, which require businesses to have public parking. Because of these regulations, this parking lot will always be a parking lot, regardless of whether the town leases it. It won’t be used for anything else. As you go to vote, also consider whether the owners should be required to pay a fair share of the construction and maintenance costs. This project increases the value of the owners’ properties, increases the rents they can charge for their commercial space, and results in bigger resale prices. The terms of the proposed leases, moreover, require the Town to assume all the costs for maintenance for 30 years. That means the owners of the properties will have avoided costs for construction and maintenance while retaining the benefits of the bargain. During the negotiations, therefore, the Town should have insisted on some contribution to reflect these financial realities.

In reply, advocates for the parking project say the owners have lost control of their lots, so it’s a fair deal. But, to make that pitch credible, we need to know why “control” is so valuable. What would the owners do with this control that makes even more financial sense than demand these leases which provide the owners with unlimited parking passes to 70 percent of the parking spaces the Town plans to create, while the town pays for, builds, and then maintains a spiffy parking lot on their properties.

The parking lot, if built, would benefit the uptown. Many would use it and experience the enhancement. If the deal, though flawed, is the best choice under the circumstances, voters should vote “no” meaning don’t override the Council’s divided vote.

On the other hand, if the project is not built, the money could be used for some other public benefit. So if the deal is too imprudent despite the benefits, voters should vote “yes” to reverse the deal. But rather than base the decision on scary tales, it should be based upon an understanding of the complexities. Either way, business in the uptown area will go on.

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

One Week to Register to Vote for Municipal Elections on November 8th

Press release from Secretary of the State Denise Merrill:

For Immediate Release:                                                                            For more information:
October 25, 2011                                                                                        Av Harris: (860) 509-6255
                                                                                     Cell: (860) 463-5939
-Press Release-
Merrill: One Week to Register to Vote for Municipal Elections on November 8th
Secretary of the State Reminds Voters Registration forms Must be Postmarked by Today, In-Person Registration Deadline is 8:00 P.M. Tuesday November 1st 

Hartford:  Secretary of the State Denise Merrill today is reminding Connecticut voters who wish to register by mail that voter registration forms must be postmarked no later than today in order to cast a ballot in the upcoming municipal elections on Tuesday November 8, 2011.  Eligible voters who wish to register in-person may do so at their Registrar of Voters office until 8:00 p.m. on Tuesday November 1st to qualify for the Municipal Elections.

“The municipal elections to decide who will serve in some key decision making roles in your community are approaching very fast, so I urge adult citizens of Connecticut to make sure they are registered now,” said Secretary Merrill, Connecticut’s chief election official.  “Crucial decisions on town and city budgets, schools, infrastructure and environmental policy are facing many towns in our state.  Make sure you have a voice by registering to vote by next Tuesday at 8:00 p.m.” 

Polls will open statewide from 6:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m. on Tuesday November 8, 2011, when the majority of Connecticut’s municipalities will hold a General Election for municipal candidates.  Absentee ballots are also available, voters can go online to www.sots.ct.gov to download an application for an absentee ballot or a voter registration card, see if they are registered and where their polling place is located and see the ballot for their town and city.  Today is also the last day write-in candidates wishing to run in the Municipal elections can register with the Secretary of the State’s office.  Registration forms for write-in candidates must be received by the Secretary of the State by 4:00 p.m. today. 




Av Harris
Director of Communications
Connecticut Secretary of the State Denise Merrill
(860) 509-6255 ofc
(860) 463-5939 cell

From Wallingford’s Democratic mayoral candidate:

New ideas to move Wallingford forward

As published in the Record Journal, Saturday October 22, 2011

clip_image002

By Vinnie Testa

I am confident that, based on my record, experience and vision for Wallingford, I am the best person, today, to lead our community through the current tough times and ensure we emerge stronger and better prepared for the future.

I respect Mayor Dickinson and commend him for his service. I also believe, however, that we have failed to move forward. Our Grand List has dropped, our operations are inefficient, our facilities are crumbling and we are cutting critical services to balance our budgets. We need a new approach.

I have specific plans for Wallingford that will: reduce expenses by modernizing how we do business while sharing services between the town and Board of Education; recruit new high-tech businesses to rebuild our tax base; and improve public safety by restoring critical paramedic services and strengthening our police force by retaining the officers we pay so much to train.

Over 30 years ago, our previous mayors had the vision to develop our industrial parks. That resulted in the tax base that allowed us to maintain our schools, provide services and spend on improving facilities and parks, while keeping tax rates very favorable compared to other towns. What’s been missing since then, however, is planning for continued economic development, facility maintenance and, as we all know, modernizing the way government operates. We cannot sustain the quality of life in this community without attracting new tax dollars and running our operations more efficiently to cut costs.

I have a specific plan to bring new businesses to town. I spent over 25 years in sales and business development. I know how to target industries and negotiate to establish partnerships.

I envision establishing Wallingford as a clean energy research and manufacturing center. I’ve spoken with people that provide venture capital to new start-up companies looking to set up shop.
What better place than our own Silicon Valley for synergistic businesses that are pioneers in a cutting-edge field? This will rebuild our tax base and provide good jobs for our children, who we need to stay and raise their families here.

It’s time we took a close look at how our departments operate. I will do that and identify where we can save money and do things smarter. In our labor negotiations, it’s time we got creative and bargained in good faith. Lost arbitrations waste money.

How many of you work for a company that does business as it did in 1990? We can save time and money by offering online bill payments and access to more information. We can reduce the cost of government through the smart use of technology. Sharing services between the town and Board of Education will free up people to do work we now contract out at great expense.

I helped develop our school system’s Strategic Plan. What I will do to increase our tax base and cut costs will provide the resources to implement that plan and stop the cycle of teacher layoffs.

I was born and raised in Wallingford. When my boys were growing up, I coached them in baseball, basketball, soccer and lacrosse. I was a Cub Scout Den Leader, and I’ve taught catechism for 20 years.

I served eight years on the Board of Education and two on the Wetlands Commission. I am in my eighth year as a Town Councilor. I’ve served on many boards and charities. I want to preserve the strong sense of community in our great town.

It’s time for new ideas. It’s time we moved forward. I’m Vinnie Testa, and not only do I approve this message, I am this message. Thank you!

Monday, October 24, 2011

WHA calls lawyer after getting draft audit

Board reviews Nere’s status, holes in records

As published in the Record Journal, Saturday October 22, 2011

By Robert Cyr
Record-Journal staff
rcyr@record-journal.com
(203) 317-2224

WALLINGFORD
— Public housing officials are consulting with their attorney to determine whether a draft audit of Wallingford Housing Authority finances could warrant removal of its longtime director, Stephen Nere, according to Chairman Michael Misiti.

The authority released draft results of the forensic audit this week. The WHA operates 317 low- and moderate-income rental units and has an annual operating budget of about $1.5 million. The Housing Authority is funded by tenant rental payments, state grants, and federal assistance administered by state agencies. The state also holds mortgage debt on Housing Authority properties. Besides meeting with its attorney regarding Nere, the Housing Authority board is reviewing the audit report and deciding if further investigation will be requested from the auditing firm that was hired to look for unusual items in financial records, Misiti said. Nere was not available for comment Friday. Since the board approved conducting an audit in May, it has rejected two requests by Nere to have the authority buy out the rest of his contract, which is due to expire next year. Nere, 60, has been executive director for 26 years and makes $100,000 a year.

Misiti said he could not confirm whether Nere had recently requested another buyout.

“We’re not in negotiations with him right now, but I would think so,” he said.

The audit was formally requested by the Tenant Council earlier this year and later approved by the board to investigate allegations of mismanagement at the authority, which has been embroiled in controversy for more than a year.

Although the audit was approved in May and was expected to take several weeks, holes in financial records and problems with accounting software delayed the work by several months and ultimately made it impossible for the auditor to fully investigate the books, Misiti said.

According to the report, the authority was “not fully using the financial software general ledger function and therefore general ledger activity was not available” for 2006 and 2007. For fiscal year 2008, the auditor found ledger balance reports, but “the trial balance amounts did not reflect activity in a format that would allow the type of analysis we would normally perform.”

The report adds that “without a balanced and complete general ledger, we were unable to review the Authority’s financial activity to identify items that may be considered unusual or would be identified for further analysis.”

Misiti said the board will ask the auditor to explain the unavailability of the records needed to complete a full analysis. Because the authority is required by state housing officials to audit its finances every year, records would be needed for that purpose, he said.

“Was it not available, or was it not available in the manner that he wanted it?” he said. “There are definitely some things that look like there’s a problem. Let’s say the ledgers are not available, in electronic or paper form. That absolutely says someone’s hiding something. Without complete ledgers there’s no way you can add up the numbers.”

Mayor William W. Dickinson Jr. said the town has no direct oversight of the authority, but if criminal charges were to arise from the audit, they would begin with a criminal complaint brought to the Wallingford Police Department.

“Any inability to complete an audit is extremely unfortunate,” he said. “We all have to show details of what we’ve done and how we’ve done it as to the use of money.”

The $12,000 audit was conducted by Farmington accounting firm Kostin, Ruffkess & Co., with a $15,000 spending cap in case further work was requested. The board asked the firm to study records for three years.

While looking into money given to Housing Authority employees during that time, auditors found two instances in which an advance was given to a worker for a housing conference, but there was no documentation for the expenses or expected refund of the advance, if due. “In one instance only the hotel bill was attached to the travel voucher form and that amount was less than the advance,” according to the report. The report also finds that the authority paid employees $50 a day for meals while at conferences of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials, but could find no examples in which meals were not included at similar association events. “We recommend that the Authority revisit this practice as it relates to local conferences since the use of advances is not a common practice for municipal entities,” the report states. The report also found that there was no procedure for a bidding process for vendor services and some services were awarded without a written contract or description of work performed.

Auditor Joseph Centofanti wrote that he began with a forensic evaluation of the authority completed in November in order to avoid duplicating investigations of accounting practices. The evaluation last year made more than 50 recommendations to tighten the authority’s recordkeeping and procedures. Many of those recommendations were immediately taken up by the board, including locking up checkbooks and keeping a three-part receipt book.
Centofanti was not available for comment.

The recent audit is not the first time Nere has been linked with financial problems. For the past two years, Nere has filed his housing budget after the June 30 deadline with the state, on the last day of two 30day extensions.

According to court documents, two credit card companies won judgments against Nere personally last year, and he has been ordered to pay $78,392.84. Another company, whose case is pending, seeks $53,498.33.

In August, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development completed an investigation into Nere when it found he had used, with board approval, more than $700 to pay his personal lawyer in an unspecified lawsuit. Nere was not required to return the money, but was warned not to repeat the error.

HUD’s connection to the WHA is through the state Department of Economic and Community Development, which disburses federal funds to McKenna Court, a 30-unit housing complex for senior citizens. HUD officials did not return calls.

Nere is appointed and serves at the will of the Housing Authority board of commissioners, whose five members are appointed by the Town Council. While members can be removed by the council, only the housing board can terminate the executive director for cause without violating his contract. The housing board, however, has been mired in controversy for the past year and only one current member, Thomas Mezzei, was on the board during the years investigated by the auditor. Earlier this year, two longtime Republican members who served on the board during the three years, Robert Prentice and Patrick Monahan, resigned within a day of each other.

Mezzei, the only Democrat on the board then, said he thought there was enough in the draft report to fire Nere for cause.

“We never spent much time then and our meetings didn’t even last an hour,” he said. “They just always just did what they wanted, and it was four against one. Right now, little by little, we’re trying to get to the end of the road.”

Prentice, chairman of the Republican Town Committee, had served 25 years on the board when he quit in February. He later said it was to spend more time with his family and to avoid the political infighting on the board and scrutiny from concerned town councilors. He was not available for comment. The Connecticut Housing Finance Authority, which manages mortgage debt at the WHA, has received the audit, but would not be involved in any potential action that stems from the report, said CHFA spokeswoman Lisa Kidder.

Saturday, October 22, 2011

CRAIG FISHBEIN - Why I Support the Referendum

Why I Support the Referendum by Craig C. Fishbein
As originally published on the CRAIG FISHBEIN for TOWN COUNCIL website.


image

As a matter of principle, I am opposed to government picking winners and losers. It is for that reason that I opposed the GM bailouts, as well as those that were given to AIG. Similarly, in recent months, Wallingford made a decision for the town to pay for the restructuring and re-paving of the 130 parking spaces in the rear of Simpson Court, and for the following reasons, on November 14th, I am voting "YES" to repeal the parking deal that was recently approved by the Wallingford Town Council.

In addition to the re-paving, the town will also install cobblestoned pavement in the alleyways, decorative lighting, as well as dumpster enclosures, and it would assume the ongoing maintenance of the lot, including trash and snow removal, plus electricity to light the lot, and the property owner's insurance bills for the lot's safety. All of the above, in exchange for a thirty year lease for public parking in the lot, with this municipal parking being limited to four hour slots (for some).

The town has currently committed to expend up to $500,000.00 for the above, that figure having doubled in just the past two years (as recently as 2008 the estimated costs were only $250,000.00).

Yes, the plan would more than likely be of benefit to the merchants in Simpson Court, however, here comes the rub: while privately owned by four entities, the property owners are not paying anything for the improvements to their property; there are no additional spots being added to the lot (which is already being fully used); and the property owners are being given 90 passes to be given to people of their choosing that exempt the holder from the four hour parking restriction (the town is not monitoring to whom the passes are being given). Additionally, the town is prohibited from metering the lot so as to re-coup their expenses from the actual users.

Please note that all of this has occurred while the Wooding Caplan property (one that the town actually owns) remains vacant, overrun by weeds, virtually unlit, marked by ditches that used to be potholes, and the town was recently forced to sell the American Legion Building right next to the Town Hall because it could not find the approximately $25,000.00 to fix the roof and to repaint it.

It is true that the funds for the initial infrastructure improvements come from a fund that is held by the town, paid by the electric division in lieu of taxes, that can only be used for capital projects. However, in my opinion, that is just a "shell game" as this past year, as well as last, there were capital projects in the town budget that could have been paid for with the funds that are being expended on this project. In both of the past years, there were tax increases to pay for those capital projects.

In fact, this year it is estimated that the town will be issuing bonds for in excess of 25 million dollars for new school roofs. The annual interest alone on this project will be about $500,000.00 (the amount that is being expended on this project, with no financial buy in by the property owners).

The property owners have countered with threats that, unless the town redoes their lot, that they will shut it down to municipal traffic. In my opinion, while they threaten to become the manufacturers of tumbleweeds, the same property owners would be shooting themselves in the foot.

In order to operate a business, a merchant needs a certain amount of parking. In order to continue to rent to their merchant tenants, the property owners would have to allow someone to use the lot. In order to come through with their threat the property owners would have to monitor the lot for those parking there that were not patronizing the owner’s property. I highly doubt that that would ever happen.

Here, the property owners are stating that they are in the center of town, and therefore that they deserve preferential treatment. Maybe that is true. However, in many other towns, those who demand preferential treatment pay higher taxes. It is for that reason that other towns have downtown tax zones. While I am not in favor of such a proposition, I can see how they come about, especially when private property owners try to hold their own town hostage.

I have proposed that the property owners contribute a portion of funds for the initial infrastructure improvements. My suggestion has been $50,000.00 liens on their properties, payable when the properties are sold or ten years (whichever comes sooner), accruing interest at 4.5% per year. That, in my opinion would be at least somewhat fair.

The cost savings to the town could be put into improving the Wooding Caplan property for increased parking in our downtown. In my opinion, that would be of best benefit to the town of Wallingford. Additionally, the parking passes should be issued by the town to the individual users. It is not the re-doing of the parking lot that I object to, rather it is the deal that has been struck. Therefore, on November 14th I will be voting "YES" to repeal the terms of the current lease as, next time, it needs to be negotiated with the whole of the town of Wallingford in mind.

Thursday, October 20, 2011

North Farms Co 7 Volunteer Fire Dept. Open House October 22nd

North Farms Co 7 Volunteer Fire Department is celebrating 65 Years of Service at their Open House on October 22nd from 3pm to 6pm






Wednesday, October 19, 2011

THE LINES ARE DRAWN IN WALLINGFORD — AND SO ARE THE SIGNS

As published in the Recrod Journal, Tuesday October 18, 2011

By Robert Cyr
Record-Journal
staff
(203) 317-2224

WALLINGFORD
— As a referendum to overturn a Town Council decision draws near, signs are literally pointing to more businesses supporting a controversial deal the town has made to spruce up a downtown parking lot in return for 30 years of free parking.

In August, the council agreed to enter into a lease agreement with the property owners of four downtown buildings at Simpson Court, along North Main Street, to spend up to a half million dollars to repave and refurbish the lot in return for free public parking.
A day after the council’s decision, a petition drive was started by resident Robert Gross, who collected enough signatures to force a referendum, which is scheduled for Nov. 14. Two political action committees formed — one supporting and one against the plan — and the opposing signs have quickly become ubiquitous throughout town.

“People are starting to understand how this is going to benefit the town of Wallingford,” said Christopher Diorio, head of the “Support Our Downtown” committee.

Diorio, also vice chairman of the Republican Town Committee, said 18 signs have gone up in the windows of local businesses, out of the 290 signs
he’s given out. The vast majority have gone to residents for posting on their lawns. The signs are paid for by donations to the political action committee, although businesses have also made donations, he said.

“At least a dozen businesses approached us, but we approached some, too,” he said.

One business owner, however, has stood apart from the otherwise heavy
support among downtown businesses for the parking deal. Christian Rao, owner of Cafe Ra at 350 Center St., is close enough to the parking lot to reap the benefits of pedestrian traffic but said he has to explain to countless customers why he is against the town’s investing money in private property.

Signs that urge a “Yes” vote ask to overturn the lease, while a “No” vote keeps it in place.

“A lot of them don’t understand the situation because it’s confusing with the ‘yes’ and the ‘no’,” Rao said. “I stress to them it’s not that I don’t want parking downtown, I just don’t think it’s the best solution. I have an issue with restrictions and I have an
issue with our businesses not contributing.”

The lease stipulates that business owners will be able to give out up to 90 parking passes to their employees to use any of the planned 130 parking spaces for more than four hours. Public parking will be restricted to four hours.

Varying configurations of property owners have been in a year-to-year lease agreement with the town since 1961 to provide free parking in return for lot maintenance. Owner disillusionment with the quality of maintenance, however, led to the current lease agreement. Annual revenue
from the Wallingford Electric Division will pay for upgrades to the lot, with plans for trees and lighting.

Christine Rinere, owner of The Dressing Room at 3 N. Main St., said she does not live in town but looked into the issue more closely when her customers had more and more questions about signs at other businesses. After researching, Rinere said she was in favor of the lease and put up her sign.

“I thought it was good for downtown; it was not costing anyone anything, it was not taking anything away from anybody and that to me sounded like a win-win,” she said.

Business owners along Simpson Court with signs supporting the lease, including the Half Moon Cafe and Body and Soul Day Spa, were not available for comment Monday.

Geno Zandri, chairman of the PAC “Citizens Against Private Parking Deal,” said that while only one downtown business was with the opposition, hundreds of residents have asked to put “Yes: Repeal the Lease” signs on their lawns. Business owners would clearly support the lease, he said.

“They’re hoping that if that lot gets fixed, they’re next in line to get theirs fixed,” he said. “And wouldn’t that be a sweetheart deal?”